California Environmental Quality Act: sports and entertainment project.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes administrative procedures for the review and certification of the EIR for a project and judicial review procedures for any action or proceeding brought to challenge the lead agency's decision to certify the EIR or to grant project approvals. This bill would authorize the Governor to certify a specified sports and entertainment project located in the City of Inglewood for streamlining if the project meets certain requirements. The bill would apply certain rules of court establishing procedures requiring actions or proceedings seeking judicial review pursuant to CEQA or the granting of project approvals, including any appeals therefrom, to be resolved within 270 days of the filing of the certified record of proceedings with the court to an action or proceeding seeking judicial review of the lead agency's action related to the certified project. The bill would require the lead agency to prepare concurrently the record of proceedings with the environmental review of the certified project, as specified. Because the lead agency would be required to prepare concurrently the record of proceedings, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. If the lead agency fails to certify an EIR for the project before January 1, 2025, the bill's provisions would be repealed as of that date. (2) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Inglewood. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Signed Sep 30, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2018 · Assembly Sep 1, 2018
How they voted
28–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 32
Aug 31, 2018
D
Democratic21
95% Yea
R
Republican11
72% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
44
Key actions
18
Committee
17
Amendments
6
Sep 30, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-4-7)
assembly
Aug 31, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-0-4)
senate
Aug 31, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 68. Noes 4.).
lower
Aug 31, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 31).
lower
Aug 31, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 31, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 27, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 27, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 20, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 16, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Reconsideration of a favorable vote granted.
upper
Aug 13, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 3, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 2, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 26).
upper
Jun 21, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 13, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on EQ. and JUD.
upper
Jun 7, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 11, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Jun 26, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 13, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 18, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Apr 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 30, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 987
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 987. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline