California Coastal Commission: ex parte communications: database.
Summary
The California Coastal Act of 1976 establishes the California Coastal Commission, and prescribes the membership and functions and duties of the commission. For purposes of the act, an "ex parte communication" is defined as any oral or written communication between a member of the commission and an interested person, as defined, about a matter within the commission's jurisdiction, as defined, that does not occur in a public hearing, workshop, or other official proceeding or on the official record of the proceeding on the matter, excluding certain communications, including communications between a staff member acting in his or her official capacity and any commission member or interested person, as prescribed. The act prohibits a commission member and an interested person from conducting an ex parte communication unless the member fully discloses and makes public the ex parte communication by providing a full report of the communication to the executive director of the commission within 7 days after the communication or, if the communication occurs within 7 days of the next commission hearing, to the commission on the record of the proceeding at that hearing. This bill would, as of July 1, 2018, delete the requirement that the commission member provide a full report of the communication to the executive director of the commission within 7 days after the communication or, if the communication occurs within 7 days of the next commission hearing, to the commission on the record of the proceeding at that hearing. The bill would instead prohibit ex parte communication unless the commission member complies with specified requirements, including verbally disclosing at the hearing all ex parte communications that occurred on any given item to be heard at the hearing, including the identity of the person or persons engaging in the communication, prior to that item being heard at the hearing. This bill would additionally require the commission, no later than July 1, 2018, to develop, implement, and maintain a publicly searchable database for the online reporting of ex parte communications required to be disclosed pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require that the database be regularly updated to include all information pertaining to an ex parte communication between a commission member and an interested person, and that any disclosure of an ex parte communication be made available to the public on the online database within 7 days from the date the communication takes place. The bill would require that, for ex parte communications that take place less than 7 days prior to the hearing on the matter, the disclosure be posted on the online database prior to the beginning of the hearing at which the matter to which the communication pertains will be discussed. The bill would require the commission member to be personally responsible for ensuring the database is updated with their ex parte communications, as prescribed.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2017
Last action Sep 1, 2017
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2017
How they voted
64–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 70
May 31, 2017
D
Democratic48
95% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican21
85% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
5
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 18, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 11).
upper
Jun 29, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
May 31, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-6)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 26).
lower
Apr 26, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 18, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 6, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 3).
lower
Mar 21, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 20, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 16, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 684
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 684. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline