Whistleblowers: California State Auditor.
Summary
Existing law creates the California State Auditor's Office, which is independent of the executive branch and legislative control, to examine and report annually upon the financial statements prepared by the executive branch. Existing law exempts the California State Auditor from specific provisions of existing law relating to oversight by state control agencies, including specific provisions relating to employment, administration, contracting, fiscal matters, and the adoption of regulations. Existing law, the California Whistleblower Protection Act, authorizes the auditor to conduct an investigative audit upon receiving specific information that an employee or state agency has engaged in an improper governmental activity, as defined. The act requires the auditor to establish a means of submitting allegations of improper governmental activity, and generally requires the auditor to keep confidential every investigation, including all investigative files and work product. This bill would require the auditor to create an alternative system for submission to an independent investigator of allegations of improper governmental activity engaged or participated in by employees of the office. The bill would require submissions to be delivered to the Employment and Administrative Mandate Section of the Department of Justice without prior review by the auditor. The bill would require the section to review submissions and, if it determines that a submission constitutes an allegation of improper governmental activity, to transmit the submission to the independent investigator for further action. The bill would define "improper governmental activity" and "independent investigator" for its purposes. The bill would require the independent investigator to conduct investigations in a manner consistent with provisions of the act relating to other state civil service employees. The bill would require the independent investigator, if he or she finds that the facts support a conclusion that an employee engaged or participated in improper governmental activities, to prepare a confidential investigative report and, subject to specific limitations, send a copy of the report and gathered evidence to the auditor and certain other persons within the office. The bill would require the independent investigator, if the independent investigator determines it to be appropriate, to report this information to the Attorney General, to the policy committees of the Senate and Assembly having jurisdiction over the subject involved, and to any other authority that the independent investigator determines appropriate. The bill would authorize the independent investigator, subject to specific limitations, to provide to the auditor any evidence gathered during the investigation that, in the judgment of the independent investigator, is necessary to support any of the report's recommendations. The bill would require the auditor to report specific information to the independent investigator. The bill would require the independent investigator, if the auditor elects not to take adverse action, to notify the Joint Legislative Audit Committee (JLAC) of the report and, upon request, to provide JLAC a copy as prescribed. The bill would authorize the independent investigator to seek consent from the State Personnel Board to file disciplinary charges if the office does not.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2016
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Dec 5, 2016
Signed Oct 9, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 15, 2017 · Assembly Sep 16, 2017
How they voted
22–7
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 32
Sep 15, 2017
D
Democratic22
81% Yea
R
Republican10
60% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
12
Committee
10
Amendments
6
Oct 9, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 16, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-3)
assembly
Sep 15, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-7-3)
senate
Sep 15, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3520.).
lower
Sep 15, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 8, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 18, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 17, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 11).
upper
Jun 5, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
upper
May 24, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 3, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 20, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 17, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
lower
Apr 5, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 4).
lower
Mar 6, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Jan 19, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and RLS.
lower
Dec 6, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 5.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Freddie Rodriguez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 31
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 31. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline