Personal vehicle sharing: recalled vehicles.
Summary
Existing law generally governs the transactions between a rental car company, also referred to as a rental company, and its customers. Existing law, the Consumer Automotive Recall Safety Act (CARS Act) , prohibits a dealer or rental car company, as defined, with a motor vehicle fleet of 34 or fewer loaner or rental vehicles from loaning, renting, or offering for loan or rent a vehicle subject to a manufacturer's recall after receiving a notice of the recall, as specified, until the vehicle has been repaired, with exceptions. Existing law requires a personal vehicle sharing program, which facilitates the sharing of private passenger vehicles for noncommercial use, to provide specified insurance coverage for a vehicle and driver while the vehicle is engaged in personal ride sharing. Under existing law, it is an infraction for a person to violate, or fail to comply with, a provision of the Vehicle Code, unless otherwise specified. This bill would prohibit, as soon as practicable but not more than 48 hours after a vehicle is subject to a manufacturer's recall and a recall notice has been issued by the manufacturer and appears in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recall database, or not more than 48 hours after receiving notification of a manufacturer's recall by a specified third party, a personal vehicle sharing program, as defined, from facilitating or arranging for transportation with that vehicle until after any recall notices for that vehicle no longer appear in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recall database. By creating new prohibitions, the violation of which would be a crime under existing law, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The CARS Act provides that it does not create any legal duty upon the dealer, rental car company, or the Department of Motor Vehicles related to the accuracy, errors, or omissions contained in a recall database report or any legal duty to provide information added to a recall database after the dealer, rental car company, or department obtained the recall database report. This bill would additionally provide that the CARS Act does not create any legal duty upon a personal vehicle sharing program related to the accuracy, errors, or omissions contained in a recall database report or any legal duty to provide information added to a recall database after a personal vehicle sharing program obtained the recall database report. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 16, 2018
Signed Sep 20, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2018 · Assembly May 25, 2018
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Aug 29, 2018
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
14
Committee
11
Amendments
6
Sep 20, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 1. Page 7008.).
lower
Aug 29, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Aug 29, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 24, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 3, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 2, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 26).
upper
Jun 20, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 7, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and JUD.
upper
May 25, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (56-2-14)
assembly
May 23, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (May 23).
lower
May 14, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
lower
May 9, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 1).
lower
Apr 24, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 5, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 2, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 22, 2018
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 22, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 17, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Evan Low
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2873
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2873. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline