Protective orders.
Summary
Under existing law, the court is required to consider, at the time of sentencing, issuing a protective order, which may be valid for up to 10 years, in a case in which a defendant has been convicted of a crime of domestic violence or of specified sex offenses, restraining the defendant from any contact with the victim. Under existing law, contempt of a court order is a misdemeanor, as specified. This bill would require the court to consider issuing a protective order restraining the defendant from any contact with a percipient witness to a crime involving domestic violence, a violation of specified sex offenses, or a violation of laws relating to criminal gangs, if it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that the witness has been harassed, as specified. The bill would also require the court to consider issuing that restraining order, which may be valid for up to 10 years, for a victim if the defendant is convicted of a violation of laws relating to criminal gangs. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Aug 2017
Signed into Law
Sep 2017
Introduced Jan 31, 2017
Signed Sep 25, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Aug 21, 2017 · Assembly May 1, 2017
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 32
Aug 21, 2017
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
12
Committee
11
Amendments
4
Sep 25, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 7, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3009.).
lower
Aug 22, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 21, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-1)
senate
Jul 10, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 26, 2017
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 20, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 10, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 1, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-3)
assembly
Apr 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 29, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 21).
lower
Mar 14, 2017
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 13, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 9, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 13, 2017
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 1, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 264
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 264. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline