Telecommunications: universal service programs.
Summary
Existing law, the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, establishes a program of cooperative federalism for the regulation of telecommunications to attain the goal of local competition, while implementing specific, predictable, and sufficient federal and state mechanisms to preserve and advance universal service, consistent with certain universal service principles. The universal service principles include the principle that consumers in all regions of the nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, should have access to telecommunications and information services, including interexchange services and advanced telecommunications and information services, that are reasonably comparable to those services provided in urban areas and that are available at rates that are reasonably comparable to rates charged for similar services in urban areas. Existing law authorizes the Public Utilities Commission to supervise and regulate every public utility in the state, including telephone corporations, and to fix just and reasonable rates and charges for public utilities. Existing law establishes the state's 6 universal service funds in the State Treasury, including the California High-Cost Fund-A Administrative Committee Fund and the California High-Cost Fund-B Administrative Committee Fund, and provides that moneys in each of the state's universal service funds are the proceeds of rates and are held in trust for the benefit of ratepayers and to compensate telephone corporations for their costs of providing universal service. Moneys in the funds may only be expended to accomplish specified telecommunications universal service programs, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act or upon supplemental appropriation. Existing law, until January 1, 2019, requires the commission to develop, implement, and maintain a suitable program to establish a fair and equitable local rate structure aided by universal service rate support to small independent telephone corporations that serve rural areas and are subject to rate-of-return regulation by the commission (the CHCF-A program) . Existing law, until January 1, 2019, requires the commission to develop, implement, and maintain a suitable, competitively neutral, and broad-based program to establish a fair and equitable local rate support structure aided by universal service rate support to telephone corporations serving areas where the cost of providing services exceeds rates charged by providers, as determined by the commission (the CHCF-B program) . This bill would extend the CHCF-A program and CHCF-B program requirements to January 1, 2023. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or an order or direction of the commission is a crime. Because the CHCF-A program and CHCF-B program, that are extended under the provisions of this bill, are within the act and a decision or order of the commission implements the programs' requirements, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the definition of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
May 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Jan 30, 2018
Signed Sep 5, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2018 · Assembly May 29, 2018
How they voted
29–1
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 32
Aug 20, 2018
D
Democratic21
95% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Sep 5, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 20, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-1-2)
senate
Aug 20, 2018
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 17, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2018
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 19, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
May 29, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-3)
assembly
May 25, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
May 2, 2018
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2018
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 11, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 8, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on C. & C.
lower
Jan 31, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 2.
lower
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1959
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1959. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline