Workers' compensation: off-duty peace officer.
Summary
Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law requires workers' compensation proceedings to commence within one year of specified dates and circumstances, including, among others, the date of injury. Existing law provides that whenever any peace officer, as defined, is injured, dies, or is disabled from performing his or her duties as a peace officer by reason of engaging in the apprehension or attempted apprehension of law violators or suspected law violators, or protection or preservation of life or property, or the preservation of the peace anywhere in this state, including the local jurisdiction in which he or she is employed, but is not at the time acting under the immediate direction of his or her employer, the peace officer or his or her dependents, as the case may be, shall be accorded by his or her employer all of the same benefits, including the benefits that the peace officer or his or her dependents would have received had that peace officer been acting under the immediate direction of his or her employer. Existing law provides that any injury, disability, or death incurred under the circumstances described in this section shall be deemed to have arisen out of and been sustained in the course of employment for purposes of workers' compensation and all other benefits. This bill would state that an employer, at its discretion or in accordance with specified policies, is not precluded from accepting liability for compensation for an injury sustained by a peace officer by reason of engaging in the apprehension or attempted apprehension of law violators or suspected law violators, or protection or preservation of life or property, or the preservation of the peace, outside the state of California, but who was not at the time acting under the immediate direction of his or her employer, including any claims for injuries sustained by peace officers during the October 1, 2017, mass shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada, if the employer determines providing compensation serves its public purposes. The bill, for purposes of worker's compensation claims filed for injuries sustained during the October 1, 2017, mass shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada, would deem the date of injury as the operative date of these provisions. The bill would provide that acceptance of liability shall not affect the determination of whether or not the peace officer acted within the scope of his or her employment for any other purpose.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
Apr 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Jan 3, 2018
Signed Sep 23, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 27, 2018 · Assembly Apr 12, 2018
How they voted
32–0
Passed
Total votes 32
Aug 27, 2018
D
Democratic21
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Sep 23, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2018
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6847.).
lower
Aug 27, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0)
senate
Aug 27, 2018
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 20, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 8, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 28, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 27).
upper
Apr 25, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Apr 12, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-7)
assembly
Apr 4, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 4).
lower
Jan 16, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Jan 4, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 3.
lower
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1749
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1749. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline