Information technology: Technology Recovery Plans: inventory.
Summary
The California Emergency Services Act sets forth the duties of the Office of Emergency Services with respect to specified emergency preparedness, mitigation, and response activities within the state. Existing law establishes the Department of Technology under the supervision of the Director of Technology who is also known as the State Chief Information Officer, and generally requires the Department of Technology to be responsible for the approval and oversight of information technology projects by, among other things, consulting with state agencies during initial project planning to ensure that project proposals are based on well-defined programmatic needs. Existing law establishes the Office of Information Security, within the Department of Technology, under the direction of a chief who reports to the Director of Technology. Existing law requires the Department of Technology, in consultation with the Office of Emergency Services and in compliance with the information security program required to be established by the chief of the Office of Information Security, to update the Technology Recovery Plan element of the State Administrative Manual to ensure the inclusion of cybersecurity strategy incident response standards for each state agency to secure its critical infrastructure controls and critical infrastructure information. Existing law requires each state agency to provide its updated Technology Recovery Plan and report on its compliance with these updated standards to the department, as specified, and authorizes the department, in consultation with the Office of Emergency Services, to provide suggestions for a state agency to improve compliance with these standards. Existing law prohibits public disclosure of reports and public records relating to the cybersecurity strategies of state agencies, as specified. This bill would require each state agency, as part of its Technology Recovery Plan, to provide the department with an inventory of all critical infrastructure controls, and their associated assets, in the possession of the agency. The bill would authorize a local entity that receives state funds for the purposes of storing, sharing, or transmitting data, or in support of an information technology project with a state entity, upon the request of the department, to submit a Technology Recovery Plan, as specified, to the department. The bill would authorize the department to provide suggestions with regard to the plans. The bill would prohibit public disclosure of these plans. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2017
Committee Review
Sep 2017
Assembly Passage
May 2017
Senate Passage
Sep 2017
Signed into Law
Oct 2017
Introduced Feb 16, 2017
Signed Oct 14, 2017
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2017 · Assembly May 31, 2017
How they voted
32–0
Passed
Total votes 32
Sep 12, 2017
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
12
Committee
14
Amendments
4
Oct 14, 2017
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 13, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3298.).
lower
Sep 12, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0)
senate
Sep 12, 2017
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 14 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 6, 2017
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 1, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 21, 2017
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 27, 2017
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 14, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and JUD.
upper
May 31, 2017
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-4)
assembly
May 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (May 26).
lower
May 17, 2017
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2017
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on G.O. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Apr 18, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 17, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 29, 2017
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 28, 2017
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 27, 2017
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and G.O.
lower
Feb 17, 2017
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jacqui Irwin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1022
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1022. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline