Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act.
Summary
Existing law provides for the disposition of a testator's property by will. Existing law also provides for the disposition of that portion of a decedent's estate not disposed of by will. Existing law provides that the decedent's property, including property devised by a will, is generally subject to probate administration, except as specified. AB 691 of the 2015–16 Regular Session would enact the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, which would authorize a decedent's personal representative or trustee to access and manage digital assets and electronic communications, as specified. Among other provisions, AB 691 would provide that a custodian of digital assets, and its officers, employees, and agents, are immune from liability for an act or omission done in good faith and in compliance with the act. This bill would specify that this immunity does not apply in a case of gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct. The bill would become operative only if AB 691 is enacted prior to the enactment of this bill.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Jan 14, 2016
Signed Sep 24, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2016 · Assembly Aug 31, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
May 31, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
40
Key actions
11
Committee
13
Amendments
2
Sep 24, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-1)
assembly
Aug 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5574.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 30, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 25, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (August 23).
lower
Aug 19, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 11).
lower
Jun 27, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 20).
lower
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Jun 6, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and REV. & TAX.
lower
May 31, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
May 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3998.) (May 27).
upper
Apr 5, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 4, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3334.) (March 30).
upper
Mar 8, 2016
Upper · Passed
March 16 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jan 28, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jan 14, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 873
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 873. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline