SB 552 California Senate · 2015-2016 Regular Session

Public water systems: disadvantaged communities: consolidation or extension of service: administrative and managerial services.

Summary
Existing law, the California Safe Drinking Water Act, provides for the operation of public water systems and imposes on the State Water Resources Control Board various responsibilities and duties. The act authorizes the state board to order consolidation with a receiving water system where a public water system, or a state small water system within a disadvantaged community, consistently fails to provide an adequate supply of safe drinking water. The act authorizes the state board to order the extension of service to an area that does not have access to an adequate supply of safe drinking water so long as the extension of service is an interim extension of service in preparation for consolidation. Existing law, for these purposes, defines "disadvantaged community" to mean a disadvantaged community that is in an unincorporated area or is served by a mutual water company. This bill would authorize the state board to order consolidation where a public water system or a state small water system is serving, rather than within, a disadvantaged community, and would limit the authority of the state board to order consolidation or extension of service to provide that authority only with regard to a disadvantaged community. This bill would make a community disadvantaged for these purposes if the community is in a mobilehome park, even if it is not in an unincorporated area or served by a mutual water company. The act requires the state board, before ordering consolidation or extension of service, to take certain actions, including consulting with specified entities, to hold at least one initial public meeting, as specified, and to obtain written consent from any domestic well owner for consolidation or extension of service. The act provides that any affected resident within the consolidation or extended service area who does not provide written consent is ineligible, until consent is provided, for any future water-related grant funding from the state, except as specified. This bill would also require the state board, before ordering consolidation or extension of service, to consult with public water systems in the chain of distribution of the potentially receiving water system. The bill would provide that an initial public meeting is not required for a potentially subsumed area that is served only by domestic wells. The bill would apply to the domestic well owner, instead of to an affected resident, within the consolidation or extended service area the written consent requirement for eligibility for water-related grant funding. The act requires the state board, upon ordering the consolidation or extension of service, to adequately compensate the owners of a privately owned subsumed water system for the fair market value of the system as determined by the Public Utilities Commission for water corporations subject to the commission's jurisdiction or the state board for all other systems. The act prohibits a consolidated water system from increasing charges on existing customers of the receiving water system solely as a consequence of the consolidation or extension of service unless the customer receives a corresponding benefit. This bill would instead authorize the Public Utilities Commission or the state board to determine the fair market value of a subsumed water system, without regard to whether the system is a water corporation subject to the commission's jurisdiction. The bill would prohibit fees or charges imposed on a customer of a subsumed water system from exceeding the cost of consolidating the water system or the cost of extension of service to the area. The act exempts the consolidation or extension of service pursuant to these provisions from the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, which governs the procedures for the formation and change of organization of cities and special districts. This bill would instead exempt an action taken by the state board pursuant to these provisions from the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. This bill would authorize the state board, for the purpose of providing affordable, safe drinking water to disadvantaged communities and preventing fraud, waste, and abuse, to contract with an administrator to provide administrative and managerial services to a designated water system and to order the designated public water system to accept those services if sufficient funding is available and if the state board makes a certain finding. The bill would define designated water system as a public water system that serves a disadvantaged community and that the state board finds consistently fails to provide an adequate and affordable supply of safe drinking water. The bill would require the state board to provide a public water system with notice, as specified, and to conduct a public meeting, as specified, before determining that the public water system is a designated public water system. The bill would authorize the administrator of a designated public water system to expend available moneys for capital infrastructure improvements that the designated public water system needs to provide an adequate and affordable supply of safe drinking water, to set and collect user water rates and fees, and to expend available moneys for the operation and maintenance costs of the designated public water system. The bill would require the state board to work with the administrator of the public water system and the communities served by that designated public water system to develop, within the shortest feasible timeframe, adequate technical, managerial, and financial capacity to deliver safe drinking water so that the services of the administrator are no longer necessary. The bill would not apply these administrator provisions to a charter city, charter county, or charter city and county. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 116681 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by AB 1611 and SB 839 that would become operative if this bill and one or both of those bills are enacted and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 26, 2015 Signed Sep 28, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015 · Assembly Aug 23, 2016

How they voted

264
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2015
D Democratic23
23 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
3 Yea 4 Nay 3
40% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
42
Key actions
9
Committee
18
Amendments
2
Sep 28, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 5494.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 26, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 5456.)
upper
Aug 24, 2016
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E.Q. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 5326.) Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Aug 24, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
upper
Aug 23, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-26-1)
assembly
Aug 23, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 11).
lower
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 28, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
lower
Jun 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on W., P., & W. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 14).
lower
May 27, 2016
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and W., P., & W. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 27). Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
May 17, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
lower
Jul 9, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jul 7, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-4-3)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 1156.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 30, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 858.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 16, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Feb 26, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Lois Wolk
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
CA
3