CalWORKs: eligibility.
Summary
Existing law requires each county to provide cash assistance and other social services to needy families through the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program using federal Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) block grant program, state, and county funds. Under existing law, for purposes of determining a family's maximum aid payment under the CalWORKs program, the number of needy persons in the same family is not increased for any child born into a family that has received aid under the CalWORKs program continuously for the 10 months prior to the birth of the child, with specified exceptions. This bill would repeal that exclusion for purposes of determining the family's maximum aid payment and would expressly prohibit the denial of aid, or the denial of an increase in the maximum aid payment, if a child, on whose behalf aid or an increase in aid is being requested, was born into an applicant's or recipient's family while the applicant's or recipient's family was receiving aid under the CalWORKs program. The bill would specify that an applicant or recipient is not entitled to an increased benefit payment for any month prior to January 1, 2016, as a result of the repeal of that exclusion or the enactment of that express prohibition. The bill would also prohibit the department from conditioning an applicant's or recipient's eligibility for aid on the applicant's or recipient's disclosure of information regarding rape, incest, or contraception, as specified, or the applicant's or recipient's use of contraception. Existing law continuously appropriates moneys from the General Fund to defray a portion of county aid grant costs under the CalWORKs program. This bill would declare that no appropriation would be made for purposes of the bill. To the extent that this bill affects eligibility under the CalWORKs program, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 1, 2014
Last action Aug 29, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
24–5
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
40% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Aug 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (August 27).
lower
Jul 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 15, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-5-4)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 1146.) (May 28).
upper
Mar 25, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 416.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 15, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Dec 1, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 23
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 23. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline