Public water system: permits.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the California Safe Drinking Water Act, imposes on the State Water Resources Control Board various responsibilities and duties relating to providing a dependable, safe supply of drinking water. The act prohibits a person from operating a public water system unless he or she first submits an application, including a technical report, to the state board and receives a permit, as specified. The act requires the state board, upon determination that the application is complete, to make a specified investigation, and allows the state board to impose permit conditions, requirements for system improvements, and time schedules as the state board deems necessary to ensure an affordable, reliable, and adequate supply of water at all times that is pure, wholesome, and potable. The act provides that a person who knowingly makes a false statement or representation in a report submitted, maintained, or used for purposes of compliance with the act may be punished as a misdemeanor. This bill would require a person submitting an application for a permit for a proposed new public water system to first submit a preliminary technical report to the state board at least 6 months before initiating construction of any water-related improvement, as defined. Because a misstatement in the report could be a crime under the provision described above, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the scope of a crime. The bill would allow the state board to direct the applicant to undertake additional discussion and negotiation with certain existing public water systems the state board determines have the technical, managerial, and financial capacity to provide an adequate and reliable supply of domestic water to the service area of the proposed new public water system, as specified, and would require an applicant to comply before submitting an application for a permit to operate a system and would prohibit the application from being deemed complete unless the applicant has complied. The bill would, if the state board determines that it is feasible for the service area of the public water system addressed by the application to be served by one or more currently permitted public water systems, authorize the state board to deny the permit of a proposed new public water system if it determines that it is reasonably foreseeable that the proposed new public water system will be unable to provide affordable, safe drinking water in the reasonably foreseeable future, as prescribed. (2) Existing law allows the state board to delegate primary responsibility for the administration and enforcement of the act within a county to a local health officer if certain criteria are met. Existing law requires that the local primacy agency be empowered with all of the authority granted to the state board over the specified public water systems. This bill would prohibit a local primacy agency from issuing a permit to operate a public water system without the concurrence of the state board. The bill would require, for a proposed new public water system that would be regulated by a local primacy agency, the applicant to also submit a copy of the preliminary technical report to the state board. (3) Existing law declares the established policy of the state that every human being has the right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water adequate for human consumption, cooking, and sanitary purposes. Existing law requires a city or county that determines a project, as defined, is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act to identify certain water systems that may supply water for the project and to request those public water systems to prepare and approve a specified water supply assessment. Under existing law, if no public water system is identified, the city or county is required to prepare and approve the water supply assessment. Existing law provides that if, as a result of its assessment, the public water system or city or county concludes that its water supplies are, or will be, insufficient, the public water system or city or county is required to provide its plans for acquiring additional water supplies, as prescribed. This bill would prohibit a city, including a charter city, or a county from issuing a building permit for the construction of a new residential development where a source of the water supply is water transported by a water hauler, bottled water, a water-vending machine, or a retail water facility, as specified. By imposing new duties on a city or county in connection with the issuance of a building permit, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 18, 2016
Signed Sep 29, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2016 · Assembly Aug 25, 2016
How they voted
21–11
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Aug 29, 2016
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Sep 29, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-11-1)
senate
Aug 29, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 5476.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (37-27-7)
assembly
Aug 25, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 3, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (August 3).
lower
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 28, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (June 28).
lower
Jun 20, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
lower
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on W., P., & W. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
lower
Jun 8, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
May 16, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and W., P., & W.
lower
May 2, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 6, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 3419.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1263
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1263. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline