Habeas corpus: new evidence: motion to vacate judgment: indemnity.
Summary
Existing law allows every person who is unlawfully imprisoned or restrained of his or her liberty to prosecute a writ of habeas corpus to inquire into the cause of his or her imprisonment or restraint. Existing law allows a writ of habeas corpus to be prosecuted for, but not limited to, false evidence that is substantially material or probative to the issue of guilt or punishment that was introduced at trial and false physical evidence which was a material factor directly related to the plea of guilty of the person. This bill would additionally allow a writ of habeas corpus to be prosecuted on the basis of new evidence that is credible, material, presented without substantial delay, and of such decisive force and value that it would have more likely than not changed the outcome at trial. Existing law requires the California Victim Compensation Board to recommend an appropriation be made by the Legislature for the purpose of indemnifying a person if the evidence shows that a crime with which the person was charged was either not committed at all, or, if committed, was not committed by that person. Existing law requires that the appropriation recommended shall be a sum equivalent to $140 per day of incarceration served. If a court grants a writ of habeas corpus or vacates a judgment on the basis of new evidence and finds that the new evidence points unerringly to innocence, existing law requires the board to recommend an appropriation to the Legislature pursuant to these provisions without a hearing. This bill would require the board, without a hearing, to recommend an appropriation to the Legislature if the court finds that the person is factually innocent. The bill would make additional clarifying and technical changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 18, 2016
Signed Sep 28, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2016 · Assembly Aug 18, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Jun 1, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Sep 28, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5430.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 19, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-2)
assembly
Aug 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (August 11).
lower
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 28, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 13, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 1, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
May 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 4004.) (May 27).
upper
Apr 5, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3395.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Co
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Co
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Co
Rob Bonta
DDemocratic
Co
Steve Glazer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1134
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1134. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline