Custodial interrogation: juveniles.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a peace officer to take a minor into temporary custody when that officer has reasonable cause to believe that the minor has committed a crime or violated an order of the juvenile court. In these circumstances, existing law requires the peace officer to advise the minor that anything he or she says can be used against him or her, that he or she has the right to remain silent, that he or she has a right to have counsel present during any interrogation, and that he or she has a right to have counsel appointed if he or she is unable to afford counsel. This bill would require that a youth under 18 years of age consult with legal counsel in person, by telephone, or by video conference prior to a custodial interrogation and before waiving any of the above-specified rights. The bill would provide that consultation with legal counsel cannot be waived. The bill would require the court to consider the effect of the failure to comply with the above-specified requirement in adjudicating the admissibility of statements of a youth under 18 years of age made during or after a custodial interrogation. The bill also clarifies that these provisions do not apply to the admissibility of statements of a youth under 18 years of age if certain criteria are met.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 16, 2016
Vetoed Sep 30, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2016 · Assembly Aug 23, 2016
How they voted
21–11
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Jun 1, 2016
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
6
Committee
11
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2016
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 30, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 30, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 13. Page 5523.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 30, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 23, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-25-2)
assembly
Aug 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (August 11).
lower
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 28, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 13, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 1, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-11-1)
senate
May 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4002.) (May 27).
upper
Apr 20, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3613.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 31, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 25, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 16, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1052
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1052. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline