Securities transactions: qualifications by permit: liability.
Summary
Existing law, the Corporate Securities Law of 1968, requires securities offered or sold in this state in an issuer or nonissuer transaction to be qualified through an application filed with the Commissioner of Business Oversight, unless exempt from the qualification requirements. That law makes it unlawful, for a person in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of a security, to engage in fraudulent or misleading acts or omissions. This bill would authorize an applicant to file an application for qualification of the offer or sale of a security by crowdfunding permit if certain conditions are met, including that the total offering of securities by the applicant to be sold in a 12-month period, within or outside this state, is limited to $1,000,000, less a specified amount; the aggregate amount of securities sold to any investor, including any amount sold during the 12-month period preceding the date of the transaction, does not exceed the lesser of $5,000 or 10% of the net worth of that natural person; and the issuer will not, directly or indirectly, conduct any unsolicited telephone solicitation of the securities offered. This bill would impose a filing fee of $200 plus 15 of 2% of the aggregate value of the securities sought to be sold in this state. Existing law provides that any person who violates a condition of qualification of the offer or sale of a security is liable to any person acquiring the security sold in violation, who may sue to recover the consideration paid for such security with interest thereon at the legal rate or for damages, as specified. This bill would extend that provision to a violation of a condition of qualification by permit authorized by this bill. This bill would also require a court to award reasonable attorney's fees and costs, and authorize the award of treble and punitive damages, to a prevailing purchaser in an action brought against any person who violates those conditions of qualification by permit authorized by this bill. Existing law imposes liability on any person who engages in specified unlawful activity to the person who purchases a security from him or sells a security to him, and authorizes the purchaser or seller to sue either for rescission or for damages. This bill would provide that the plaintiff is not required to plead or prove that the defendant acted with scienter.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 25, 2015
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
4
May 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 20, 2015
Committee
In committee: Set, second hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 13, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
May 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 23, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 22, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (April 20).
lower
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
lower
Feb 26, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
HP
Henry Perea
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 722
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 722. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline