Immigration services.
Summary
Existing law, the State Bar Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, a public corporation. Existing law prohibits an attorney from demanding or accepting the advance payment of any funds from a person before the enactment of an immigration reform act, as defined, that is enacted after October 5, 2013, and before January 1, 2017, and requires any funds received during a specified time to be refunded to the client promptly, but no later than 30 days after the receipt of any funds, as provided. Existing law requires the State Bar to provide specified information relating to immigration reform act services on its Internet Web site. This bill would revise the definition of an immigration reform act to include any immigration reform act enacted after October 5, 2013, the President's executive actions on immigration announced on November 20, 2014, or any future executive action or order that authorizes an undocumented immigrant who entered the United States without inspection, who did not depart after the expiration of a nonimmigrant visa, or who stayed beyond an approved period, to attain a lawful status under federal law or to otherwise remain in the country. This bill would require the State Bar to announce and post on its Internet Web site when an executive action or order described above has been issued. This bill would provide that it is unlawful for an attorney to demand or accept the advance payment of any funds for immigration reform act services in connection with requests for expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, requests for Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents, or other future relief, as provided, under federal law. This bill would also provide that an advance payment of funds for immigration reform act services may be placed into a client trust account, as specified. Existing law provides for the regulation of a person engaged in the business or acting in the capacity of an immigration consultant, and provides that a violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law requires an immigration consultant to establish a client trust account and to deposit in this account any funds received from the client prior to performing immigration reform act services, as defined, for that client. Existing law prohibits an immigration consultant from demanding or accepting the advance payment of any funds from a person before the enactment of an immigration reform act, as defined, that is enacted after October 5, 2013, and before January 1, 2017, and requires any funds received during a specified time to be refunded to the client promptly, but no later than 30 days after the receipt of any funds, as provided. Existing law prescribes civil penalties, not to exceed $1,000 per day for each violation, for immigration consultants who violate these provisions. This bill would revise the definition of an immigration reform act to include any immigration reform act enacted after October 5, 2013, the President's executive actions on immigration announced on November 20, 2014, or any future executive action or order that authorizes an undocumented immigrant who either entered the United States without inspection or who did not depart after the expiration of a nonimmigrant visa, to attain a lawful status under federal law. This bill would require the State Bar to announce and post on its Internet Web site when an executive action or order described above has been issued. This bill would provide that it is unlawful for an immigration consultant to demand or accept the advance payment of any funds for immigration reform act services in connection with requests for expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, requests for Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents, expanded Provisional Waivers of Unlawful Presence, or other future relief, as provided, under federal law. Because a violation of these provisions by an immigration consultant would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2014
Committee Review
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Apr 2015
Senate Passage
May 2015
Signed into Law
Jun 2015
Introduced Dec 10, 2014
Signed Jun 17, 2015
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2015 · Assembly Apr 13, 2015
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 33
May 28, 2015
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Jun 17, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 2, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1759.).
lower
May 28, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-2)
senate
May 28, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after May 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
May 18, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 6, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 27, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 13, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
Mar 26, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Mar 25, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (March 25).
lower
Mar 23, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 19, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 18, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 17).
lower
Mar 10, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jan 22, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Dec 11, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 10.
lower
Dec 10, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lorena Gonzalez
DDemocratic
Co
Catharine B. Baker
RRepublican
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
David Chiu
DDemocratic
Co
Devon Mathis
RRepublican
Co
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Co
Kansen Chu
DDemocratic
Co
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
Co
RJ
Rocky J. Chávez
RRepublican
Co
Shirley N. Weber
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 60
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 60. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline