Child custody proceedings: testimony by electronic means.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the court in a child custody proceeding to permit testimony by telephone, audiovisual means, or other electronic means when a witness or party resides in another state. Existing law also requires a court to permit a party to present testimony and participate in court-ordered child custody mediation by electronic means when the party's military deployment has a material effect on his or her ability to appear in person, to the extent that this technology is reasonably available to the court and protects the due process rights of all parties. This bill would require the court to allow a party whose deportation or detention by the federal Department of Homeland Security materially effects his or her ability to appear in person at a child custody proceeding to present testimony and evidence and participate in mandatory child custody mediation by electronic means, including telephone, video teleconferencing, or other means, to the extent that this technology is reasonably available to the court and protects the due process rights of all parties.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Apr 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Signed into Law
Jul 2015
Introduced Feb 17, 2015
Signed Jul 13, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jun 25, 2015 · Assembly Apr 23, 2015
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Jun 25, 2015
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Jul 13, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 25, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-1)
senate
Jun 25, 2015
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 22, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 10, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 7, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 23, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-1-4)
assembly
Apr 15, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 15).
lower
Mar 24, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 2, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 18, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 365
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 365. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline