District-based municipal elections: preapproval hearings.
Summary
Existing law provides for political subdivisions that encompass areas of representation within the state. With respect to these areas, public officials are generally elected by all of the voters of the political subdivision (at-large) or by districts formed within the political subdivision (district-based) . Existing law requires a political subdivision, as defined, that changes from an at-large method of election to a district-based election to hold at least 2 public hearings on a proposal to establish the district boundaries of the political subdivision before a public hearing at which the governing body of the political subdivision votes to approve or defeat the proposal. This bill would instead require a political subdivision that changes to, or establishes, district-based elections to hold public hearings before and after drawing a preliminary map or maps of the proposed district boundaries, as specified. Existing law, the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (CVRA) , prohibits the use of an at-large method of election in a political subdivision if it would impair the ability of a protected class, as defined, to elect candidates of its choice or otherwise influence the outcome of an election. The CVRA provides that a voter who is a member of a protected class may bring an action in superior court to enforce its provisions. This bill would require a prospective plaintiff under the CVRA to first send a written notice to the political subdivision against which the action would be brought indicating that the method of election used by the political subdivision may violate the CVRA. The bill would permit the political subdivision to take ameliorative steps to correct the alleged violation before the prospective plaintiff commences litigation, and it would stay the prospective plaintiff's ability to file suit for a prescribed amount of time. This bill would also permit a prospective plaintiff who sent a written notice, as described, to recover from the political subdivision reasonable costs incurred in supporting the written notice. Because the bill would impose additional duties on local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jan 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 17, 2015
Signed Sep 28, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2016 · Assembly Jan 25, 2016
How they voted
24–9
Passed
Total votes 33
Aug 23, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
39
Key actions
8
Committee
18
Amendments
3
Sep 28, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 22. Page 6537.).
lower
Aug 30, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 29).
lower
Aug 25, 2016
Committee
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in, but first be re-referred to Com. on E. & R. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25). Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Aug 25, 2016
Committee
(pending re-referral to the Com. on E. & R.)
lower
Aug 25, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and E. & R. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-9)
senate
Aug 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 22, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 22, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 1, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Feb 29, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Feb 4, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E. & C.A. and JUD.
upper
Jan 25, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-23-4)
assembly
Jan 19, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (January 19).
lower
Jan 13, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jan 5, 2016
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on E. & R. and JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (January 5). Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Jan 4, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jan 4, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Mar 2, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Feb 18, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 350
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 350. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline