Court reporters.
Summary
Existing law provides that, except as specified, the fee for original transcripts prepared by an official court reporter or by a court reporter pro tempore is $0.85 for each 100 words, and for each copy purchased at the same time, $0.15 for each 100 words. Existing law provides that, except as specified, the fee for a first copy of a transcript by a person who does not simultaneously purchase the original transcript is $0.20 for each 100 words, and for each additional copy purchased at the same time, $0.15 for each 100 words. Existing law authorizes a court reporter, in civil cases, to charge an additional 50% for special daily copy service. This bill would increase the fee charged for original transcripts and copies purchased at the same time, and copies purchased thereafter without the original transcript, incrementally commencing January 1, 2017, except as specified. The bill would also provide that the fee for transcription is an additional 50% for special daily copy service. The bill would require the Judicial Council to report to the Legislature by January 1, 2021, with regard to transcript fees, as specified.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Vetoed Sep 24, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2016 · Assembly Jun 2, 2016
How they voted
22–10
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Aug 23, 2016
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
7
Sep 24, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 25, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 6306.).
lower
Aug 23, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-10-1)
senate
Aug 23, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 2, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-24-2)
assembly
May 31, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 27, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 2.) (May 27).
lower
May 11, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 21, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 19, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (April 19).
lower
Apr 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 17, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RH
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2629
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2629. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline