Sentencing: restorative justice.
Summary
Existing law provides legislative findings and declarations that the purpose of imprisonment for crime is punishment and that the elimination of disparity and the provision of uniformity of sentences can best be achieved by determinate sentences fixed by statute in proportion to the seriousness of the offense, as specified. Existing law further provides that, notwithstanding those provisions, the Legislature finds and declares that programs should be available for inmates, including, but not limited to, educational programs, that are designed to prepare nonviolent felony offenders for successful reentry into the community. Existing law encourages the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to give priority enrollment in programs to promote successful return to the community to inmates with short remaining terms of commitment, as specified. This bill would instead make legislative findings and declarations that the purpose of sentencing is public safety achieved through punishment, rehabilitation, and restorative justice. The bill would amend the above legislative findings and declarations to remove the provision relating to determinate sentences and to state that educational, rehabilitative, and restorative justice programs should be available, as specified, and would encourage the department to allow all eligible inmates the opportunity to enroll in programs that promote successful return to the community. This bill would also direct the department to establish a mission statement consistent with the principles described in the legislative findings and declarations. Under existing law, most felonies are punishable by a triad of terms of incarceration in the state prison, comprised of low, middle, and upper lengths of terms. Until January 1, 2017, the choice of the appropriate term that is to best serve the interests of justice rests within the sound discretion of the court. On and after January 1, 2017, existing law requires the court to impose the middle term, unless there are circumstances in aggravation or mitigation of the crime. This bill would extend to January 1, 2022, the authority of the court to, in its sound discretion, impose the appropriate term that best serves the interests of justice. The bill would, on and after January 1, 2022, require the court to impose the middle term, unless there are circumstances in aggravation or mitigation of the crime. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1170 of the Penal Code, proposed by SB 1084, that would become operative only if this bill and SB 1084 are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Signed Sep 27, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 25, 2016 · Assembly May 27, 2016
How they voted
23–10
Passed
Total votes 33
Aug 25, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
9
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Sep 27, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 50. Noes 27. Page 6461.).
lower
Aug 26, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 25, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-10)
senate
Aug 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 27, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-21-9)
assembly
May 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 5.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 20, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 13, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 10, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Shirley N. Weber
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
Kansen Chu
DDemocratic
Co
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Co
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2590
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2590. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline