Workers' compensation: utilization review.
Summary
Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law requires every employer, for purposes of workers' compensation, to establish a utilization review process to prospectively, retrospectively, or concurrently review and approve, modify, delay, or deny, based in whole or in part on medical necessity to cure and relieve, treatment recommendations by physicians prior to, retrospectively, or concurrent with the provision of medical treatment services, as provided. Existing law requires prospective or concurrent decisions to be made in a timely fashion that is appropriate for the nature of the employee's condition. Existing law also requires that decisions to approve, modify, delay, or deny requests by physicians for authorization prior to, or concurrent with, the provision of medical treatment services to employees be communicated to the requesting physician within 24 hours of the decision. This bill would require a physician providing treatment to an injured worker to send any request for authorization for medical treatment, with supporting documentation, to the claims administrator for the employer, insurer, or other entity according to rules adopted by the administrative director. The bill would also make technical changes. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 4610 of the Labor Code proposed by this bill and SB 1160, to be operative if both bills are enacted and this bill is enacted after SB 1160.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
May 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Signed Sep 30, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2016 · Assembly Sep 1, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Aug 31, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0)
assembly
Aug 31, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
Aug 31, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6577.).
lower
Aug 31, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jun 8, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 19, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 4, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 20, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Mar 30, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Mar 8, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jay Obernolte
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2503
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2503. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline