The Lead-Acid Battery Recycling Act of 2016.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a person from disposing, or attempting to dispose, of a lead-acid battery at a solid waste facility or on or in any land, surface waters, watercourses, or marine waters, but authorizes a person to dispose of a lead-acid battery at certain locations. Existing law requires a dealer to accept, when offered at the point of transfer, a lead-acid battery from a consumer in exchange for the new lead-acid battery purchased by that consumer from the dealer. A violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill, the Lead-Acid Battery Recycling Act of 2016, would, as of January 1, 2017, revise these provisions to require a dealer to accept, at the point of transfer, specified types of used lead-acid batteries and would prohibit the dealer from charging any fee to accept these used lead-acid batteries. The bill, on and after April 1, 2017, would require a dealer to collect a refundable deposit for each new lead-acid battery of these types from a person who purchases the battery and who does not simultaneously provide a used lead-acid battery of the same size and type, and would require the dealer to refund the deposit to the person if, within 45 days of the sale of that lead-acid battery, the person presents a used lead-acid battery of the same type and size. The bill would require a dealer to post a specified notice or include specified information on the purchaser's receipt for one of these lead-acid batteries with regard to these provisions. The bill would allow the dealer to keep any lead-acid battery refundable deposit that is not properly claimed within 45 days after the date of sale of the new lead-acid battery. This bill, on and after April 1, 2017, until March 31, 2022, would require a California battery fee in the amount of $1 to be imposed on a person, except as specified, for each replacement lead-acid battery purchased that is of one of the specified types. The bill would authorize the dealer to retain 112% of the fee as reimbursement for any costs associated with the collection of the fee and would require the dealer to remit the remainder to the State Board of Equalization (state board) for deposit into the Lead-Acid Battery Cleanup Fund, except as specified. On and after April 1, 2022, the bill would increase the California battery fee to $2. This bill, on and after April 1, 2017, until March 31, 2022, would require a manufacturer battery fee of $1 to be imposed on a manufacturer of lead-acid batteries for each lead-acid battery it sells at retail to a person in California, or that it sells to a dealer, wholesaler, distributor, or other person for retail sale in California, for deposit into the Lead-Acid Battery Cleanup Fund. The bill would require manufacturer battery fees remitted pursuant to these provisions to be credited against amounts owed by the manufacturer to the state under a judgment or determination of liability under specific hazardous materials provisions or any other law for removal, remediation, or other response costs relating to a release of a hazardous substance from a lead-acid battery recycling facility. The bill would require that the amount paid by a manufacturer for a manufacturer battery fee be considered to reduce the manufacturer's share of liability in the allocation of costs among potentially responsible parties in a contribution action brought by a private party related to a release of hazardous substances from a lead-acid battery recycling facility. Of moneys collected pursuant to this act, the bill would require the board to retain moneys necessary for the payment of refunds and to reimburse the board for expenses in the collection of the California battery fee and the manufacturer battery fee. The bill would require that the remaining moneys be deposited into the Lead-Acid Battery Cleanup Fund, which would be created by the bill, and would make the moneys available upon appropriation by the Legislature for purposes of response actions at any area of the state that is reasonably suspected to have been contaminated by the operation of a lead-acid battery recycling facility, administration of the fund, the department's administration and implementation of the act's provisions, and reimbursement of certain loans for lead cleanup. The bill would make the reimbursement money available for further loans, as specified. The bill would require $1,200,000 be loaned from the California Tire Recycling Management Fund to the board for implementing the collection of the California battery fee and the manufacturer battery fee and would require that the loan be repaid before October 1, 2017. This bill would require, on and after July 1, 2017, a manufacturer to place a recycling symbol, as specified, and other information on all replacement lead-acid batteries sold in California. This bill would require, by February 1, 2018, and annually thereafter, the department to report to the Legislature on the status of the Lead-Acid Battery Cleanup Fund and on the department's progress in implementing these provisions. This bill would authorize the board to adopt regulations to implement these lead-acid battery management provisions. Because a violation of these regulations would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require, on or before January 1, 2017, manufacturers to notify distributors, wholesalers, and dealers of the lead-acid batteries it manufactures of the bill's requirements, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Sep 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 17, 2016
Signed Sep 26, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Sep 1, 2016 · Assembly Jun 3, 2016
How they voted
24–8
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Sep 1, 2016
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
48
Key actions
11
Committee
21
Amendments
4
Sep 26, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-8-1)
senate
Sep 1, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 23. Page 6602.).
lower
Aug 31, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 31).
upper
Aug 31, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Aug 31, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 22, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 11, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 10, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 9, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Aug 8, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 3).
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jun 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and JUD.
upper
Jun 3, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-15-8)
assembly
Jun 2, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 2).
lower
Jun 2, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Jun 1, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
May 27, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 18, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 14, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 12).
lower
Apr 6, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 29, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2153
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2153. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline