Local agency employment contracts: maximum cash settlement.
Summary
Existing law requires all employment contracts between an employee and a local agency employer to contain a provision that provides for the amount of a cash settlement that may be paid out if the contract is terminated, as specified. Existing law provides that the maximum settlement that an employee can receive is an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by the number of months left on the unexpired term of the contract, or, if the unexpired terms of the contract is greater than 18 months, an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by 18. This bill would provide that in the case of a district superintendent of schools, for contracts of employment executed on or after January 1, 2016, the maximum cash settlement shall be an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by 12. Existing law limits the amount of a cash or noncash settlement that a local agency employer may provide its district superintendent of schools to an amount no greater than the superintendent's monthly salary multiplied by zero to 6, if it terminates the superintendent's contract of employment and confirms pursuant to an independent audit that the superintendent engaged in fraud, misappropriation of funds, or other illegal fiscal practices. In this case, existing law requires an administrative law judge, after a hearing, to determine the amount of the cash settlement. This bill, with regard to a contract for employment executed on or after January 1, 2016, would instead provide that a cash or noncash settlement in any amount may be paid by a local agency employer to its district superintendent of schools under these provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Aug 2015
Signed into Law
Sep 2015
Introduced Feb 2, 2015
Signed Sep 2, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Aug 17, 2015 · Assembly Jun 4, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 17, 2015
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Sep 2, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 18, 2015
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 17, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Jul 8, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 8).
upper
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 4, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-2)
assembly
May 14, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (May 13).
lower
May 5, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 7, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 9, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 3, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 215
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 215. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline