Jail Industry Authority.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the board of supervisors in specified counties, as part of a pilot jail industry program not to exceed 4 years, to establish, with the concurrence of the county sheriff, a Jail Industry Commission for that county. Existing law also requires the county board of supervisors, upon the establishment of a commission, to create a Jail Industries Fund, as specified, which may be used to fund specified purposes. Existing law specifies the composition of these commissions. This bill would repeal the authorization to create a Jail Industry Commission as a pilot program, and would instead authorize the board of supervisors of the Counties of Lake, Los Angeles, Madera, Sacramento, San Diego, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Tulare, Tuolumne, and Ventura to authorize the county sheriff or county director of corrections to create a Jail Industry Authority, as specified. The bill would also make conforming changes. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Lake, Los Angeles, Madera, Sacramento, San Diego, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Tulare, Tuolumne, and Ventura.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Apr 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 16, 2016
Signed Sep 22, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 17, 2016 · Assembly Apr 11, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Aug 17, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Sep 22, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6131.).
lower
Aug 17, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
Aug 17, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 19 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 28, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 27, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 21).
upper
Apr 28, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
Apr 11, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-2)
assembly
Mar 30, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 29).
lower
Mar 15, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 29, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and L. GOV.
lower
Feb 17, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2012
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2012. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline