Secondhand goods.
Summary
Existing law regulates secondhand dealers and coin dealers, and makes it unlawful for a person to engage in the business of a secondhand dealer without a license issued by the chief of police, the sheriff, or, where appropriate, the police commission. Existing law also regulates pawnbrokers. Existing law requires a local law enforcement agency to issue a license to engage in the business of a secondhand dealer or pawnbroker to an applicant who has not been convicted of an offense involving stolen property. Existing law requires a secondhand dealer to report, as specified, to the chief of police or sheriff all secondhand "tangible personal property," as defined, purchased, taken in trade, taken in pawn, accepted for sale on consignment, or accepted for auctioning. Existing law requires the report to include, among other things, the identification of the intended seller or pledger of the property, verified by the person taking the information by specified methods. Existing law requires the reporting of this information to the Department of Justice through a single, statewide, uniform electronic reporting system. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to develop descriptive categories and secondhand dealers and coin dealers to use these categories in their reports. This bill would define "CAPSS" as the California Pawn and SecondhandDealer System, which is the single, statewide, uniform electronic reporting system operated by the Department of Justice. The bill would eliminate the requirement that a secondhand dealer send reports on paper forms. The bill would eliminate the requirements that the Department of Justice develop, and secondhand dealers and coin dealers use, descriptive categories in their reports of acquired tangible personal property. Instead, the bill would require the Department of Justice to accept the properly spelled and non-abbreviated plain text property descriptions commonly recognized and utilized by the pawn and secondhand dealer industries. The bill would require a secondhand dealer to provide a property description in an article field descriptor, as specified. This bill would prohibit the Department of Justice, chiefs of police, and sheriffs from requiring secondhand dealers to report any additional information other than that which is required by these provisions. The bill would require that a future change to the reporting requirements of CAPSS that substantively alters the reporting standards be implemented and operated in compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act and prohibit the Department of Justice from taking any action with respect to the implementation, operation, or maintenance of CAPSS by adoption of an emergency regulation. The bill would also require the Department of Justice to convene a meeting with the Department of Technology to discuss issues pertaining to any proposed changes or upgrades, and authorize the Department of Technology to provide technological assistance for ongoing improvements, updates, or changes, to CAPSS. Existing law provides an exception to the reporting requirement for the acquisition of the same property from the same customer within 12 months of a reported transfer, except when submission of the report is specifically requested in writing by the local authorities. This bill would expand the reporting requirement exception to all acquisitions of the same property from the same customer within 12 months of a reported transfer. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 2, 2016
Signed Sep 29, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2016 · Assembly Jun 2, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Aug 24, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
7
Sep 29, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2016
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6535.).
lower
Aug 30, 2016
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
Aug 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 28, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2016
Committee
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jun 2, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-3)
assembly
May 31, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 27, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 19. Noes 1.) (May 27).
lower
May 11, 2016
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 26, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 18, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 14, 2016
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 12).
lower
Mar 29, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 3, 2016
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 4.
lower
1 primary · 19 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Evan Low
DDemocratic
Co
Andy Vidak
RRepublican
Co
Devon Mathis
RRepublican
Co
Frank Bigelow
RRepublican
Co
Freddie Rodriguez
DDemocratic
Co
Janet Nguyen
RRepublican
Co
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Cooper
DDemocratic
Co
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Co
Kevin Mullin
DDemocratic
Co
KO
Kristin Olsen
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1751
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1751. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline