Personal services contracts: legal compliance.
Summary
The California Constitution establishes that the civil service includes every officer and employee of the state, except as otherwise provided in the California Constitution, and requires civil service appointment to be made under a general system based on merit ascertained by competitive examination. The State Civil Service Act establishes standards for the use of personal services contracts by state agencies, consistent with those provisions of the California Constitution relating to civil service, and authorizes personal services contracts when prescribed conditions are met. The State Contract Act requires an applicable state department to require a prospective bidder on a public works project to answer questions inquiring whether, and if so, to explain the circumstances under which the prospective bidder has ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation. Existing law requires the questionnaire to be completed under the penalty of perjury. Existing law authorizes the department to reject the bid of a bidder who has been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation. Existing law requires a competitive bidding process for certain contracts, including amendments, entered into by any state agency for services to be rendered to the state, whether or not the services involve the furnishing or use of equipment, materials, or supplies, or are performed by an independent contractor. This bill would require every bidder for a personal services contract to complete, under the penalty of perjury, a standard questionnaire inquiring whether the bidder has ever violated state tax law or laws and regulations relating to health and safety, labor and employment, and licensing relevant to the bidder's employees, worksite, bid, and contract, and if so, requiring an explanation of the violation. The bill would prohibit the award of a personal services contract to a bidder who does not complete the required questionnaire. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
May 2014
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 11, 2014
Vetoed Sep 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2014 · Assembly Aug 27, 2014
How they voted
21–8
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 35
May 28, 2014
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
39
Key actions
10
Committee
13
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2014
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 30, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 28, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 4940.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 27, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-19-1)
assembly
Aug 27, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 26, 2014
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2 and whereby amendments were adopted on August 22.
upper
Aug 25, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 14).
lower
Aug 6, 2014
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 25, 2014
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (June 18).
lower
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
lower
May 28, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-8-6)
senate
May 23, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3706.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 24, 2014
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 10, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 8, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3091.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 17, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Feb 20, 2014
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and PUB. S.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 975
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 975. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline