Juries: criminal trials: peremptory challenges.
Summary
Existing law provides that in a criminal case, if the offense charged is punishable with a maximum term of imprisonment of 90 days or less, the defendant and the state are each entitled to 6 peremptory challenges of prospective jurors. Existing law also provides that when 2 or more defendants are jointly tried, their challenges are to be exercised jointly, but each defendant is also entitled to 4 additional challenges which may be exercised separately, and the state is entitled to the same number of additional challenges. This bill would, until January 1, 2017, recast these provisions to apply to a criminal case in which the offense charged is punishable with a maximum term of imprisonment for one year or less. The bill would provide that in that instance the defendant and the state would each be allowed 5 peremptory challenges of prospective jurors. The bill would, until January 1, 2017, provide that if 2 or more defendants are jointly tried for an offense punishable with a maximum term of one year or less, their challenges would be exercised jointly, but each defendant would also be entitled to 2 additional challenges which may be exercised separately, and the state would also be entitled to 2 additional challenges.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
May 2014
Senate Passage
Jan 2014
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
2
Committee
4
May 8, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 17, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 2591.) (January 14).
upper
Apr 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
NE
Noreen Evans
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 794
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 794. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline