Local government finance: property tax revenue allocation: vehicle license fee adjustments.
Summary
Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally provides that each jurisdiction shall be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing property tax law also requires that, for purposes of determining property tax revenue allocations in each county for the 1992–93 and 1993–94 fiscal years, the amounts of property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for allocation to school districts, community college districts, and the county office of education. Beginning with the 2004–05 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, existing law requires that each city, county, and city and county receive additional property tax revenues in the form of a vehicle license fee adjustment amount, as defined, from a Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund that exists in each county treasury. Existing law requires that these additional allocations be funded from ad valorem property tax revenues otherwise required to be allocated to educational entities. This bill would modify these reduction and transfer provisions for a city incorporating after January 1, 2004, and on or before January 1, 2012, for the 2014–15 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, by providing for a vehicle license fee adjustment amount calculated on the basis of changes in assessed valuation. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 97.70 of the Revenue and Taxation Code made by this bill and AB 1521, to take effect if both bills are chaptered and this bill is chaptered last. By imposing additional duties upon local tax officials with respect to the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Jan 10, 2013
Vetoed Sep 28, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013 · Assembly Aug 20, 2014
How they voted
28–5
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic26
96% Yea
R
Republican9
55% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
40
Key actions
13
Committee
15
Amendments
2
Sep 28, 2014
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 28, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 21, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 32. Noes 0. Page 4691.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 20, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0-3)
assembly
Aug 20, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (August 14).
lower
Aug 6, 2014
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 26, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 5). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 6, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
lower
Apr 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
lower
Sep 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-5-2)
senate
May 23, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 1006.) (May 23).
upper
May 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 7, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 785.) (May 1).
upper
Apr 29, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 25, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 24, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Roth
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Emmerson
RRepublican
Co
Eric Linder
RRepublican
Co
Melissa A. Melendez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 69
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 69. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline