Physicians and surgeons: drug prescribing privileges: investigation.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes investigators and representatives of the Medical Board of California, among others, to inquire into any alleged violation of the Medical Practice Act or any other federal or state law, regulation, or rule relevant to the practice of medicine or podiatric medicine, and to inspect documents relevant to those investigations, including the inspection and copying of any document relevant to an investigation where patient consent is given. Existing law requires specified persons, including the administrator of a peer review body, to file a report with the board within 15 days after the effective date of any specified action taken against a licensee for a medical disciplinary cause or reason. Existing law also requires a coroner to make a report to the board, among other specified entities, when he or she receives information that indicates that a death may be the result of a physician and surgeon's, podiatrist's, or physician assistant's gross negligence or incompetence. This bill would authorize the board, in any investigation that involves the death of a patient, to inspect and copy the medical records of the deceased patient without the authorization of the beneficiary or personal representative of the deceased patient or a court order solely to determine the extent to which the death was the result of the physician and surgeon's violation of the Medical Practice Act, if the board provides a written request to the physician and surgeon that includes a declaration that the board has been unsuccessful in locating or contacting the deceased patient's beneficiary or personal representative after reasonable efforts. (2) Existing law requires the board to take action against any licensee who is charged with unprofessional conduct. Unprofessional conduct is defined for this purpose to include, among other things, the repeated failure by a licensee who is the subject of a board investigation, in the absence of good cause, to attend and participate in an interview scheduled by the mutual agreement of the licensee and the board. This bill would revise that definition of unprofessional conduct to include the repeated failure by a licensee who is the subject of a board investigation, in the absence of good cause, to attend and participate in an interview by the board. (3) Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, authorizes the administrative law judge of the Medical Quality Hearing Panel to issue an interim order suspending a license, or imposing drug testing, continuing education, supervision of procedures, or other licensee restrictions. This bill would further authorize the administrative law judge to issue an interim order limiting the authority to prescribe, furnish, administer, or dispense controlled substances.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Senate Passage
May 2013
Assembly Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Sep 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Sep 27, 2013
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2013 · Assembly Sep 12, 2013
How they voted
31–3
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
May 30, 2013
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican9
55% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
12
Committee
12
Amendments
1
Sep 27, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0-1)
assembly
Sep 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2443.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 12, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (September 11).
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 21, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (August 21).
lower
Aug 19, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 13, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (August 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 6, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Jun 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
May 30, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-3-1)
senate
Apr 29, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 719.) (April 29).
upper
Apr 16, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 564.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 670
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 670. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline