Medical records: reproduction fees.
Summary
(1) Before the filing of an action or the appearance of a defendant in an action, existing law requires certain enumerated health care providers to make all of a patient's records under their custody or control available for inspection and copying by an attorney at law, or his or her representative, who presents a written authorization therefor, as specified. Existing law authorizes any person or enumerated health care provider to charge all reasonable costs incurred in making the patient records available against the person whose written authorization required the availability of the records, as specified. Where the medical records are delivered to the attorney or the attorney's representative for inspection or photocopying at the record custodian's place of business, existing law prohibits the fee for complying with the authorization from exceeding $15 dollars, plus actual costs, as specified. This bill would provide that, where the records are delivered to the attorney or the attorney's representative for inspection or copying at the record custodian's place of business and if any portion of the patient's medical records is stored on paper, the fee for complying with the authorization would be $15 dollars, plus actual costs, as specified. If any portion of the records is stored electronically and is inaccessible for inspection or copying, the bill would authorize the health care provider, in its sole discretion, to produce a paper copy of the electronic records for the attorney to inspect and copy, and to charge specified fees. The bill would delete the provision that authorizes all reasonable costs to be charged against the person whose written authorization required the production of copies of the records, and would instead require an attorney who requests that the health care provider provide paper or electronic copies of the medical records to pay certain fees, including a search and retrieval fee of $30 dollars; a fee of 50 cents per page for the first 25 pages and 25 cents for each additional page, as specified; a fee of 50 cents per page for reproduction of documents stored on microfilm, oversize documents, or documents requiring special processing; actual postage charges, as specified; and the actual cost, if any, charged to the witness by a third party for the retrieval and return of records held offsite by that third party. The bill also would require the health care provider to provide electronic copies of a patient's medical records that are stored electronically, under specified conditions. This bill would, no later than December 1 of each year, require the Director of the California Department of Health Care Services to examine the need to increase or decrease the specified fees by making a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, as specified, and would authorize the Director to increase or decrease the fees at his or her sole discretion. The bill would prohibit the fees from remaining unchanged for 3 consecutive years unless the Consumer Price Index does not change during that 3-year period. The bill would require any changes to the rates to be effective on January 1 following the December 1 calculation and to be published on the Department of Health Care Services Internet Web site on or before that date. (2) Existing law provides for procedures for the production of business records pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum. Existing law authorizes all reasonable costs, as specified, incurred by a nonparty witness to be charged against the party serving the subpoena duces tecum. This bill would clarify that the reasonable costs incurred by a nonparty witness do not apply to fees incurred in response to a subpoena for the production of medical records. Instead, the fees established for the production of medical records pursuant to an authorization would apply to the production of medical records in response to a subpoena.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Feb 3, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Apr 18, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 617.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.
upper
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Emmerson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 588
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 588. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline