Agricultural labor relations: dispute resolution.
Summary
Existing law provides that within 60 days of a decision by the Agricultural Labor Relations Board taking effect, a party may file an action to enforce the order, using specified procedures. Existing law provides that during the pendency of any appeal of the board's order, the order may not be stayed unless the appellant demonstrates that he or she is likely to prevail on the merits and that he or she will be irreparably harmed by implementation of the board's order. This bill would provide that an action to enforce the order of the board may be filed within 60 days whether or not the other party is seeking judicial review of the order. The bill would also increase the evidentiary threshold for the court to grant a stay of the board's order and require the court to make written findings supporting any order granting a stay of the order during the pendency of the appeal.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Dec 3, 2012
Vetoed Sep 28, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2013 · Assembly Aug 30, 2014
How they voted
21–9
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 34
May 6, 2013
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Sep 28, 2014
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 28, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 30, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (33-22-10)
assembly
Aug 30, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 12. Page 5009.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 20, 2014
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Aug 19, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 2).
lower
Jun 27, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 19, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
lower
Jun 5, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
May 24, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and JUD.
lower
May 6, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-9-4)
senate
Mar 13, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 291.) (March 13).
upper
Jan 10, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 25
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 25. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline