Conservatorships and guardianships: attorney's fees.
Summary
Existing law provides for the administration of guardianships and conservatorships. Existing law authorizes a guardian or conservator of an estate to petition the court for an order allowing compensation to the guardian, conservator, or attorney for the guardian or conservator, as specified. Existing law prohibits the guardian or conservator from being compensated from the estate for any costs or fees that he or she incurred in unsuccessfully opposing a petition, or other request or action, made by or on behalf of the ward or conservatee, unless the court determines that the opposition was made in good faith, based on the best interests of the ward or conservatee. This bill would instead prohibit the guardian or conservator from being compensated from the estate for any costs or fees, including attorney's fees, incurred in defending the compensation in the petition, if the court reduces or denies the compensation requested in the petition.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Senate Passage
Aug 2013
Assembly Passage
Aug 2013
Vetoed
Sep 2013
Introduced Jan 31, 2013
Vetoed Sep 24, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Apr 29, 2013 · Assembly Aug 26, 2013
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 34
Apr 29, 2013
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Feb 27, 2014
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Sep 24, 2013
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 24, 2013
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 2035.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 26, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-19-1)
assembly
Aug 26, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 15, 2013
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Jul 1, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 18, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 18).
lower
Jun 11, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 5, 2013
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 16, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 29, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-1)
senate
Apr 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 662.) (April 23).
upper
Apr 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 156
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 156. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline