Charter schools: location.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a charter school that is unable to locate within the jurisdiction or geographic boundaries of the chartering school district to establish one site outside the boundaries of the school district, but within the county in which that school district is located, if the school district where the charter school proposes to operate is notified in advance of the charter petition approval, the county superintendent of schools is notified of the location of the charter school before it commences operations and either the charter school has attempted to locate a single site or facility to house the entire program, but such a site or facility is unavailable in the area in which the school chooses to locate or the site is needed for temporary use during a construction or expansion project. This bill would delete the authority of a charter school to locate outside the jurisdiction or geographic boundaries of the chartering school district because the charter school has attempted to locate a single site or facility to house the entire program, but a site or facility is unavailable in the area in which the charter school chooses to locate. The bill would authorize a charter school to establish one facility outside the boundaries of the school district, as described above, if either (1) the school district within the jurisdiction of which the charter school proposes to operate provides written approval to the chartering school district before the charter petition is approved for that facility and before each charter petition renewal, or (2) the facility is needed for temporary use during the period of construction for a construction or expansion project, for up to 18 months, unless the school district in which the charter school intends to operate approves of a longer period of time. The bill would require a charter school locating outside the boundaries of the chartering school district for temporary use to provide the parents of pupils enrolled at the charter school with specified information at least 60 days before the beginning of the school year. The bill would also authorize a charter school to operate a facility outside the boundaries of the chartering school district if (1) the charter school was authorized before April 1, 2013, to locate at that facility and the charter school operated that facility with pupils enrolled and attending before September 15, 2014, (2) the school district within the jurisdiction of which the charter school operates provides written approval to the chartering school district, (3) the charter school is an American Indian charter school, as defined, or (4) the charter school meets the eligibility criteria for the Alternative Schools Accountability Model adopted by the State Board of Education. The bill would prohibit a school district that is assigned a negative certification, as specified, from authorizing new charter schools to locate outside the boundaries of the school district. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
May 2014
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 21, 2014
Vetoed Sep 19, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 28, 2014 · Assembly Aug 26, 2014
How they voted
22–9
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 28, 2014
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Sep 19, 2014
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 19, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 28, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-9-4)
senate
Aug 28, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 4939.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 26, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-22-4)
assembly
Aug 26, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 1, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 25).
lower
Jun 17, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 7, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 6, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 3340.) (April 30).
upper
Apr 24, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Mar 26, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Mar 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 21, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Fran Pavley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1263
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1263. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline