Restitution: collection by counties.
Summary
Existing law requires that restitution fines and fees be imposed upon a person convicted of crime. Under existing law, when a person is committed to an institution under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the court has ordered restitution, the probation officer or the district attorney, with the consent of the victim, is authorized to send the victim's contact information and a copy of the restitution order to the department for the sole purpose of distributing the restitution collected on behalf of the victim. This bill, when a person who has been ordered to pay restitution is committed to a county jail or placed on postrelease community supervision or mandatory supervision, would authorize the probation officer or district attorney to provide the victim's contact information and a copy of the restitution order, with the victim's consent, to the county agency designated by the board of supervisors to collect and distribute restitution for the sole purpose of distributing the restitution collected on behalf of the victim. Existing law makes any portion of a restitution fine or restitution fee that remains unsatisfied after a defendant is no longer on probation, parole, postrelease community supervision or mandatory supervision, or completed diversion, enforceable by the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board, as specified. Existing law requires the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to collect restitution fines and fees from inmates and authorizes the collection of those fines and fees from inmates in county jails by an agency designated by the county board of supervisors. Existing law authorizes the secretary, the local agency designated by the county board of supervisors, or, under specified circumstances, a local collection program to collect restitution fines and fees from parolees. Existing law authorizes the secretary and the local agency to deduct and retain administrative fees for fines collected from parolees. This bill would authorize the collection of restitution fines or restitution orders, in a manner to be established by the county board of supervisors, by the department or county agency designated by the board from a person who has been released from a state prison or county jail and is subject to postrelease community supervision or mandatory supervision, as specified. The bill would authorize a county board of supervisors to impose a fee upon the individual subject to postrelease community supervision or mandatory supervision to cover the actual administrative cost of collecting the restitution fine and the restitution order, not to exceed 10% of the amount collected, to be deposited in the county's general fund. The bill would require a county that elects to collect restitution fines and restitution orders pursuant to these provisions to coordinate efforts with the Franchise Tax Board, as specified. Existing law requires that persons released from prison be subject either to parole for a specified period of time or to postrelease community supervision for a period not exceeding 3 years. Existing law specifies the conditions of postrelease community supervision. This bill would require, as a condition of postrelease community supervision, that the person pay court-ordered restitution and restitution fines in the same manner as a person placed on probation. This bill would, contingent upon the enactment of SB 419 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, incorporate additional conforming changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Senate Passage
May 2014
Assembly Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Signed Sep 20, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 23, 2014 · Assembly Aug 26, 2014
How they voted
28–0
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 36
May 23, 2014
D
Democratic26
76% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Sep 20, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2014
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4910.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 26, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0)
assembly
Aug 26, 2014
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 18, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 17).
lower
May 29, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 23, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-0-8)
senate
May 20, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3504.) (May 19).
upper
Apr 29, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 28, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3218.) (April 22).
upper
Apr 10, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Fran Pavley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1197
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1197. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline