Food labeling: genetically engineered food.
Summary
Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, makes it unlawful to manufacture, sell, deliver, hold, or offer for sale, any food that is misbranded. Food is misbranded if its labeling does not conform to specified state and federal labeling requirements regarding nutrition, nutrient content or health claims, and food allergens. Violation of this law is a misdemeanor. This bill, beginning January 1, 2016, would require that any food, except as provided, offered for retail sale in the state be considered misbranded if it is entirely or partially genetically engineered, as defined, and that fact is not disclosed in a specified manner. The bill would prescribe labeling requirements for a raw agricultural commodity that is genetically engineered and packaged foods, as defined, containing some products of genetic engineering. The bill would impose these labeling requirements on manufacturers and retailers, as defined, of the commodities and foods. Because this bill would create new crimes by expanding the number of foods that could potentially be misbranded, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Jun 2014
Senate Passage
May 2014
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate May 1, 2014
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
May 1, 2014
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Jun 23, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 19, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
May 12, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
May 1, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Apr 28, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 8, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3091.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 27, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1040
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1040. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline