AB 52 California Assembly · 2013-2014 Regular Session

Native Americans: California Environmental Quality Act.

Summary
Existing law, the Native American Historic Resource Protection Act, establishes a misdemeanor for unlawfully and maliciously excavating upon, removing, destroying, injuring, or defacing a Native American historic, cultural, or sacred site, that is listed or may be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources. The California Environmental Quality Act, referred to as CEQA, requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires the lead agency to provide a responsible agency with specified notice and opportunities to comment on a proposed project. CEQA requires the Office of Planning and Research to prepare and develop, and the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to certify and adopt, guidelines for the implementation of CEQA that include, among other things, criteria for public agencies to following in determining whether or not a proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would specify that a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, as defined, is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. The bill would require a lead agency to begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project, if the tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects in that geographic area and the tribe requests consultation, prior to determining whether a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report is required for a project. The bill would specify examples of mitigation measures that may be considered to avoid or minimize impacts on tribal cultural resources. The bill would make the above provisions applicable to projects that have a notice of preparation or a notice of negative declaration filed or mitigated negative declaration on or after July 1, 2015. The bill would require the Office of Planning and Research to revise on or before July 1, 2016, the guidelines to separate the consideration of tribal cultural resources from that for paleontological resources and add consideration of tribal cultural resources. By requiring the lead agency to consider these effects relative to tribal cultural resources and to conduct consultation with California Native American tribes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law establishes the Native American Heritage Commission and vests the commission with specified powers and duties. This bill would additionally require the commission to provide each California Native American tribe, as defined, on or before July 1, 2016, with a list of all public agencies that may be a lead agency within the geographic area in which the tribe is traditionally and culturally affiliated, the contact information of those agencies, and information on how the tribe may request those public agencies to notify the tribe of projects within the jurisdiction of those public agencies for the purposes of requesting consultation. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
Jun 2013
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Dec 21, 2012 Signed Sep 25, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 27, 2014 · Assembly Jun 27, 2013

How they voted

320
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Aug 27, 2014
D Democratic25
22 Yea 3
88% Yea
R Republican10
10 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
47
Key actions
14
Committee
18
Amendments
9
Sep 25, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 28, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6651.).
lower
Aug 27, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Aug 27, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 18, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 2, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 25).
upper
Jun 16, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jun 12, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 2, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 19, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Sep 5, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Aug 26, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jul 3, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jun 27, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-0-19)
assembly
Jun 25, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 24).
lower
May 31, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
May 30, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
May 15, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 22, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 16, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 9, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 8, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 20, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 19, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Dec 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 23.
lower
Dec 21, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors

Sponsors