Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act: writ of mandate.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act requires the court, if it finds that a public agency has violated the requirements of the act, to issue an order, in the form of a peremptory writ of mandate, specifying what actions by the public agency are necessary to comply with the requirements of the act. This bill, for a peremptory writ of mandate containing specified mandates, would expressly authorize the court to require the public agency to prepare and file an initial return of the writ. The bill would require the trial court, to the extent feasible, to issue a determination indicating whether the actions specified in the initial return and any subsequent return are adequate to comply with the peremptory writ of mandate within 30 days of the filing of the return.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jun 2014
Assembly Passage
Jan 2014
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 27, 2014
How they voted
53–4
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 66
Jan 27, 2014
D
Democratic45
97% Yea
R
Republican21
42% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
8
Committee
15
Amendments
4
Jun 15, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 19, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Mar 17, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Feb 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and JUD.
upper
Jan 27, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (53-4-9)
assembly
Jan 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 23).
lower
Jan 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 13, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jan 9, 2014
Committee
(pending re-referral to the Com. on JUD.)
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (January 6). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 23, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 12, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 11, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and NAT. RES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RD
Roger Dickinson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 515
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 515. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline