Intestate succession: children.
Summary
Existing law provides that the estate of a decedent not effectively disposed of by a will passes to the decedent's heirs as prescribed by law. Existing law prohibits, for a child born out of wedlock, a natural parent or a relative of that parent from inheriting from or through the child on the basis of the parent and child relationship unless the parent or a relative of the parent acknowledged the child and the parent or a relative of the parent contributed to the support or the care of the child. This bill would revise and recast the provisions regarding inheritance of a parent from or through a child on the basis of the parent and child relationship. The bill would provide that a parent does not inherit from or through a child if the parent's parental rights were terminated and the parent-child relationship was not judicially reestablished, the parent did not acknowledge the child, or the parent left the child during the child's minority without an effort to provide for the child's support or without communication from the parent, as specified. The bill would provide that a parent who does not inherit from or through a child, pursuant to the bill's provisions, would be deemed to have predeceased the child and the intestate estate would pass as otherwise required under specified existing law of intestate succession.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jun 2013
Assembly Passage
Apr 2013
Senate Passage
Jun 2013
Signed into Law
Jun 2013
Introduced Feb 19, 2013
Signed Jun 28, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Jun 10, 2013 · Assembly Apr 11, 2013
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 35
Jun 10, 2013
D
Democratic26
76% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Jun 28, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 14, 2013
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1997.).
lower
Jun 10, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-6)
senate
Jun 10, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 4, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 4).
upper
May 23, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 25, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 11, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-3)
assembly
Apr 4, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 2).
lower
Mar 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 20, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Co
Kevin Mullin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 490
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 490. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline