Underground storage tanks: petroleum: charges.
Summary
Under the existing Barry Keene Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Trust Fund Act of 1989, every owner of an underground storage tank is required to pay a storage fee for each gallon of petroleum placed in the tank. The fees are required to be deposited in the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund and the State Water Resources Control Board is authorized to expend the moneys in the fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for various purposes, including the payment of claims to aid owners and operators of petroleum underground storage tanks who take corrective action to clean up unauthorized releases from those tanks, corrective actions undertaken by the board, a California regional water quality board, or a local agency, the cleanup and oversight of unauthorized releases at abandoned tank sites, and grants to small businesses to retrofit certain hazardous substance underground storage tanks. Existing law repeals the act on January 1, 2016, but specifies that certain associated rights, obligations, and authorities that apply prior to the repeal date do not terminate until the moneys in the fund are exhausted. Existing law, until January 1, 2014, provides for an increase in the fee for storage in an underground tank of $0.006 per gallon of petroleum. This bill would require payment of the additional $0.006 per gallon until January 1, 2016. The bill would extend the repeal date of the fund until January 1, 2018, and make conforming changes. The bill would require the board, no later than January 1, 2015, to make specified information relating to the payment of claims available on its Internet Web site. This bill would constitute a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 11, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 28, 2013
How they voted
43–18
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 64
May 28, 2013
D
Democratic43
95% Yea
R
Republican21
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 2, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 19).
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 28, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-18-3)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (May 24).
lower
May 8, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 21, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 282
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 282. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline