Transportation finance.
Summary
(1) Article XIX of the California Constitution restricts the use of fuel excise tax revenues imposed by the state on fuels used in motor vehicles upon public streets and highways to expenditure on highway and certain mass transit purposes. Existing law provides for the deposit of these revenues in the Highway Users Tax Account, and appropriates those revenues to various purposes. Existing law, with respect to the portion of these revenues that is derived from increases in the motor vehicle fuel excise tax beginning in 2010, requires an allocation to reimburse the State Highway Account for the amount of weight fee revenues that the State Highway Account is not receiving due to use of weight fee revenues to pay debt service on transportation general obligation bonds and to make certain loans, with the remaining amount of this portion of revenues allocated 44% to the State Transportation Improvement Program, 12% to the State Highway Operations and Protection Program, and 44% to city and county streets and roads. This bill would delete the provisions allocating revenues derived from the increased motor vehicle fuel excise tax to State Highway Account reimbursement, the State Transportation Improvement Program, and the State Highway Operations and Protection Program. The bill would instead provide for the Controller to apportion all of these revenues to cities and counties for local streets and roads pursuant to a specified formula, thereby making an appropriation. (2) Existing law, commencing with the 2013–14 fiscal year, requires certain revenues deposited in the State Highway Account that are not restricted as to expenditure by Article XIX of the California Constitution to be transferred to the Transportation Debt Service Fund in the State Transportation Fund for payment of current year debt service on certain transportation general obligation bonds. This bill would delete the transfer of these revenues to the Transportation Debt Service Fund, and would instead provide for appropriation in the annual Budget Act of 44% of these revenues to the State Transportation Improvement Program, 12% to the State Highway Operations and Protection Program, and 44% to city and county streets and roads pursuant to a specified formula.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Amendments
1
Apr 1, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on BUDGET. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 28, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Feb 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Eric Linder
RRepublican
Co
Beth Gaines
RRepublican
Co
CC
Connie Conway
RRepublican
Co
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Co
DL
Diane L Harkey
RRepublican
Co
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Co
Frank Bigelow
RRepublican
Co
JG
Jeff Gorell
RRepublican
Co
Jim Patterson
RRepublican
Co
KO
Kristin Olsen
RRepublican
Co
Melissa A. Melendez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2653
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2653. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline