Local government: infrastructure and revitalization financing districts.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the creation of infrastructure financing districts, as defined, for the sole purpose of financing public facilities, subject to adoption of a resolution by the legislative body and affected taxing entities proposed to be subject to division of taxes and 23 voter approval. Existing law authorizes the legislative body to, by majority vote, initiate proceedings to issue bonds for the financing of district projects by adopting a resolution, subject to specified procedures and 23 voter approval. Existing law requires an infrastructure financing plan to include the date on which an infrastructure financing district will cease to exist, which may not be more than 30 years from the date on which the ordinance forming the district is adopted. Existing law prohibits a district from including any portion of a redevelopment project area. Existing law, the Polanco Redevelopment Act, authorizes a redevelopment agency to take any action that the agency determines is necessary and consistent with state and federal laws to remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances on, under, or from property within a project area, whether the agency owns that property or not, subject to specified conditions. This bill would authorize the creation of an infrastructure and revitalization financing district, as defined, and the issuance of debt with 55% voter approval. The bill would authorize the creation of a district for up to 40 years and the issuance of debt with a final maturity date of up to 30 years, as specified. The bill would authorize a district to finance projects in redevelopment project areas and former redevelopment project areas and former military bases. The bill would authorize the legislative body of a city, as defined, to dedicate any portion of its funds received from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund to the district, if specified criteria are met. The bill would authorize a city to form a district to finance a project or projects on a former military base, if specified conditions are met. The bill would provide that the formation of the district and the issuance of debt by the district on land of a former military base that is publicly owned is not subject to voter approval, as specified. The bill would authorize a district to fund various projects, including, among others, watershed land used for the collection and treatment of water for urban uses, flood management, levees, bypasses, open space, habitat restoration, brownfields restoration, environmental mitigation, purchase of land and property for development purposes, including commercial property, hazardous cleanup, former military bases, and specified transportation purposes. The bill would authorize a district to implement hazardous cleanup pursuant to the Polanco Redevelopment Act, as specified. The bill would impose a specified reporting requirement on districts. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 33459 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by SB 470 that would become operative if this bill and SB 470 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
died
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jul 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Governor
Introduced Feb 6, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2013 · Assembly May 9, 2013
How they voted
20–11
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Sep 3, 2013
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 4, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-11-4)
senate
Jul 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 18, 2013
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 17, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 12).
upper
Jun 5, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 23, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 9, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-24-5)
assembly
May 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 1).
lower
Apr 18, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 15, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 7, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 9.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 243
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 243. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline