Pupil instruction: computer science.
Summary
Existing law requires the Instructional Quality Commission to recommend, and the State Board of Education to adopt, curriculum frameworks, as provided. Existing law defines "curriculum framework" as an outline of the components of a given course of study designed to provide state direction to school districts in the provision of instructional programs. Existing law prohibits the state board from adopting instructional materials until the 2015–16 school year, except as provided. This bill would require the commission to consider incorporating computer science curriculum content into the mathematics, science, history-social science, and English language arts/English language development curriculum frameworks, as it deems appropriate, when those frameworks are next revised. The bill would require computer science curriculum to focus on foundational concepts in computer science by integrating basic skills in technology with simple ideas about computational thinking, communication, and collaboration, and being responsible citizens in a changing digital world, as specified. The bill would require the commission to consult with classroom teachers and school administrators to ensure the age-appropriateness of the computer science curriculum. If computer science curriculum content is incorporated into the curriculum frameworks at their next revision, the bill would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to identify and post on the State Department of Education's Internet Web site professional development resources for teaching computer science curriculum content. The bill would require its provisions to be implemented in a manner that does not result in new duties or programs being imposed on local educational agencies, as specified.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly May 28, 2014
How they voted
63–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 65
May 28, 2014
D
Democratic45
100% Yea
R
Republican20
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 2, 2014
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 25).
upper
Jun 18, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 11, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 28, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-2)
assembly
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 30, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 22, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 10, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Mar 26, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 25, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2110
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2110. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline