Developmental centers: crime.
Summary
Existing law requires, upon the filing of a claim for reimbursement, a city, county, or superior court to be reimbursed for reasonable and necessary costs connected with state prisons or prisoners in connection with certain circumstances, including with any crime committed in a prison, with any hearing on any return of a writ of habeas corpus prosecuted by or on behalf of a prisoner, or with any costs incurred by a coroner in connection with the death of a prisoner. This bill would similarly require that, upon the filing of a claim for reimbursement, a city or county be reimbursed for reasonable and necessary costs related to the investigation or prosecution of a crime committed by a developmental center employee against a developmental center resident. Existing law requires a developmental center to immediately, but no later than within 2 hours of the developmental center observing, obtaining knowledge of, or suspecting abuse, report certain incidents involving a resident to the local law enforcement agency having jurisdiction over the city or county in which the developmental center is located. Existing law provides that this reporting requirement does not prevent a developmental center from reporting any other criminal act constituting a danger to the health or safety of the residents of the developmental center to the local law enforcement agency. This bill would require a local law enforcement agency having jurisdiction over the city or county in which the developmental center is located to respond within 24 hours of receiving an allegation that a crime has been committed by a developmental center employee against a developmental center resident. By imposing new duties on local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2014
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2014
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
4
Committee
8
Amendments
1
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
lower
May 7, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 23, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 8).
lower
Mar 27, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 26, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 25, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 20, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 14, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CC
Connie Conway
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1688
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1688. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline