DNA evidence.
Summary
Existing law establishes the "Sexual Assault Victims' DNA Bill of Rights," which, among other things, encourages a law enforcement agency assigned to investigate specified sexual assault offenses to perform DNA testing of rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence in a timely manner to assure the longest possible statute of limitations. Existing law also requires a law enforcement agency to inform victims of certain sexual assault offenses, if the identity of the perpetrator is in issue, if the law enforcement agency elects not to analyze DNA evidence within certain time limits. This bill instead would, with respect to specific sex offenses, encourage a law enforcement agency in whose jurisdiction the sexual assault offense occurred to submit sexual assault forensic evidence received by the agency on or after January 1, 2016, to the crime lab within 20 days after it is booked into evidence, and ensure that a rapid turnaround DNA program, as defined, is in place to submit forensic evidence collected from the victim of a sexual assault to the crime lab within 5 days after the evidence is obtained from the victim. The bill would also encourage the crime lab, with respect to sexual assault forensic evidence received by the lab on or after January 1, 2016, to process that evidence, create DNA profiles when able, and upload qualifying DNA profiles into the Combined DNA Index System as soon as practically possible, but no later than 120 days after initially receiving the evidence, or to transmit the sexual assault forensic evidence to another crime lab as soon as practically possible, but no later than 30 days after initially receiving the evidence, as specified. The bill would also revise the provisions requiring a law enforcement agency to inform victims of certain sexual assault offenses, to make the requirement applicable without regard to whether the identity of the perpetrator is in issue, if the law enforcement agency does not analyze DNA evidence, and to require those entities to notify the victims within 6 months of the time limits established under existing law. By imposing a higher level of service on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Signed into Law
Sep 2014
Introduced Jan 15, 2014
Signed Sep 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2014 · Assembly May 28, 2014
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Aug 22, 2014
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2014
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 26, 2014
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6461.).
lower
Aug 25, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 22, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-5)
senate
Aug 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 17, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 5, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 28, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0)
assembly
May 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) .
lower
Apr 9, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 26, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 11, 2014
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Jan 23, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 16, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 15.
lower
1 primary · 17 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
Andy Vidak
RRepublican
Co
Bill Quirk
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Co
Cheryl R. Brown
DDemocratic
Co
Ellen Corbett
DDemocratic
Co
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Co
JB
Joan Buchanan
DDemocratic
Co
KO
Kristin Olsen
RRepublican
Co
Lorena Gonzalez
DDemocratic
Co
Marie Waldron
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1517
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1517. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline