Local government: redevelopment: revenues from property tax override rates.
Summary
Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies. Existing law requires revenues equivalent to those that would have been allocated to each redevelopment agency, had the agency not been dissolved, to be allocated to the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund of each successor agency for making payments on the principal of and interest on loans, and moneys advanced to or indebtedness incurred by the dissolved redevelopment agencies. Existing law requires, from February 1, 2012, to July 1, 2012, inclusive, and for each fiscal year thereafter, the county auditor-controller, after deducting administrative costs, to allocate property tax revenues in each Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund in a specified manner. This bill would authorize a city or county that levies a property tax rate, approved by the voters of a city or county to make payments in support of pension programs and levied in addition to the general property tax rate, to make a request to an oversight board to prohibit revenues derived from that property tax rate from being deposited into a Redevelopment Property Tax Fund. This bill would authorize an oversight board to deny this request based on substantial evidence that a former redevelopment agency made a pledge of revenues that specifically included revenues derived from the imposition of that property tax rate. This bill, for the 2014–15 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, except to the extent an oversight board denies a request, would prohibit any revenues derived from the imposition of that property tax rate from being allocated to a Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund and would, instead, require these revenues to be allocated to, and when collected to be paid into, the fund of the city or county whose voters approved the tax. The bill would require all allocations of revenues derived from the imposition of that property tax rate made by any county auditor-controller prior to July 1, 2014, to be deemed correct, and would prohibit any city, county, county auditor-controller, successor agency, or affected taxing entity from being subject to any claim, as specified. This bill would require, to the extent that revenues derived from the imposition of a property tax rate, approved by the voters of a city or county to make payments in support of pension programs and levied in addition to the general property tax rate, are deposited into a Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, the county-auditor controller to allocate moneys from each Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund to a city or county that levies a property tax as so described after certain other allocations have been made. By adding to the duties of local government officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
Apr 2014
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Vetoed
Sep 2014
Introduced Jan 8, 2014
Vetoed Sep 29, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2014 · Assembly Apr 1, 2014
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 35
Aug 30, 2014
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
9
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Sep 29, 2014
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 30, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-6)
senate
Aug 29, 2014
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6737.).
lower
Aug 29, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 29, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 28).
upper
Aug 27, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 21, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 11, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Aug 6, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 4, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jul 3, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
May 14, 2014
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 14).
upper
Apr 10, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 1, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-5)
assembly
Mar 27, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 26).
lower
Jan 17, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jan 9, 2014
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 8.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1450
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1450. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline