Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
Summary
Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (act) , provides the sole and exclusive authority and procedure for the initiation, conduct, and completion of changes of organization and reorganization for cities and districts. For purposes of the act, existing law defines an independent district or independent special district to include any special district having a legislative body all of whose members are elected by registered voters and landowners within the district, or whose members are appointed to fixed terms. This bill would specify that the definition excludes any independent special district having a legislative body consisting, in whole or in part, of ex officio members who are officers of a county or another local agency or who are appointees of those officers other than those who are appointed to fixed terms. The act specifies the procedures for selecting members for a local agency formation commission in each county. Existing law requires the independent special district selection committee to appoint 2 regular members and one alternate member to the commission. Existing law requires the appointed members to be elected or special district officers residing within the county. This bill would require the appointed members to be elected or appointed members of the legislative body of an independent special district residing within the county. The act prohibits a local agency formation commission from reviewing a reorganization that includes an annexation to any city in Santa Clara County of unincorporated territory that is within the urban service area of the city if the reorganization is initiated by resolution of the legislative body of the city and instead appoints the city council of that city as the conducting authority for the reorganization. This bill would specify that these provisions apply to an annexation or a reorganization proposal. The act requires petitions for a merger of a district which overlaps a city, or for the establishment of the district as a subsidiary district of the city, to be signed in a specified manner for a resident voter district. Existing law requires petitions for the dissolution of a district to be signed in a specified manner for a resident voter district. This bill would instead prescribe the manner of signatures for a registered voter district. The act requires the executive officer of the commission to give specified notice of the protest hearing to be held for a district formation. Existing law requires the notice to contain specified information including a statement of the time, date, and place of the protest hearing on the proposed change of organization or reorganization and requires the protest hearing to be held on a specific date if the uninhabited territory is proposed to be annexed to a city with specified residents and population. This bill would delete the requirement that a protest hearing be held on a specific date for such an uninhabited territory and would otherwise make that uninhabited territory subject to the existing non-specific date requirement. This bill would also make other technical and conforming changes and correct erroneous references.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2013
Committee Review
Jun 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Jun 2013
Signed into Law
Aug 2013
Introduced Apr 1, 2013
Signed Aug 12, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Jun 24, 2013 · Assembly May 16, 2013
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Jun 24, 2013
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Aug 12, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 24, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Jun 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 12).
upper
May 29, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 16, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-0-7)
assembly
May 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 8).
lower
May 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 30, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 4, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 2, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee May 2.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1427
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1427. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline