Workers' compensation: medical treatment: interpreters.
Summary
Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, that generally requires employers to secure the payment of workers' compensation for injuries incurred by their employees that arise out of, or in the course of, employment. Existing law requires an employer to provide all medical services reasonably required to cure or relieve the injured worker from the effects of the injury. Under existing law, if the injured employee cannot effectively communicate with his or her treating physician because he or she cannot proficiently speak or understand the English language, the injured employee is entitled to the services of a qualified interpreter during medical treatment appointments. Existing law requires that, to be a qualified interpreter for these purposes, a person meet any requirements established by rule by the administrative director, as specified. This bill would provide that the requirement that a person meet any requirements established by the administrative director in order to be a qualified interpreter commences on March 1, 2014. This bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Sep 2013
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Sep 2013
Signed into Law
Oct 2013
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Signed Oct 13, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2013 · Assembly Sep 13, 2013
How they voted
30–1
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 36
Sep 12, 2013
D
Democratic26
80% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
41
Key actions
14
Committee
20
Amendments
1
Oct 13, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 13, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-1)
assembly
Sep 12, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-1-5)
senate
Sep 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 3343.).
lower
Sep 12, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (September 12).
lower
Sep 12, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 12, 2013
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 11, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Return to Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (September 11).
upper
Sep 11, 2013
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Sep 11, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Jun 24, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jun 4, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 29, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and P.E. & R.
upper
May 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 8).
lower
May 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 22, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on INS. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 16).
lower
Apr 9, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 14, 2013
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and INS.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1376
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1376. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline