Comprehensive school safety plans: tactical response plans.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides that school districts and county offices of education are responsible for the overall development of comprehensive school safety plans for its schools operating kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive. Existing law requires the schoolsite council of a school to write and develop a school safety plan relevant to the needs and resources of the particular school, except as specified with regard to a small school district. Existing law requires the school safety plan to include specified strategies and programs that will provide or maintain a high level of school safety. Existing law authorizes a school district or county office of education to elect to not have its schoolsite council develop and write portions of its school safety plan that include tactical responses to criminal incidents, as defined, and instead develop those portions of the school safety plan with law enforcement officials and other specified persons. Existing law requires any vote to approve the tactical response plan to be announced in open session following a closed session. Existing law provides certain protections from disclosure for this tactical response plan. This bill would require a comprehensive school safety plan to include a tactical response plan, and would revise the definition of "tactical responses to criminal incidents" to include a plan to safeguard against incidents that include a firearm, explosive, or other deadly weapon. The bill would require any vote to approve or update the tactical response plan to be announced in open session following a closed session. The bill would prohibit the governing board of a school district or a county office of education from being required to disclose those portions of the tactical response plan that may be kept private. (2) By requiring school districts and county offices of education to perform additional duties in regards to their comprehensive school safety plans, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
May 2014
Assembly Passage
Jan 2014
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 27, 2014
How they voted
63–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 66
Jan 27, 2014
D
Democratic45
97% Yea
R
Republican21
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
6
Committee
11
Amendments
3
May 6, 2014
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Feb 6, 2014
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jan 27, 2014
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-3)
assembly
Jan 23, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (January 23).
lower
Jan 23, 2014
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jan 17, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 16, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 16, 2014
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (January 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 7, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jan 6, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 3, 2013
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 1, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 21, 2013
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
Feb 22, 2013
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1264
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1264. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline