Water: floods.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a city or county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley from approving a discretionary permit or other discretionary entitlement, or a ministerial permit that would result in the construction of a new residence, for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone, unless the city or county finds, based on substantial evidence in the record, that certain criteria is met. This bill would prohibit a city or county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley from approving a discretionary permit or entitlement that would result in the construction of a new building or construction that would result in an increase in allowed occupancy for an existing building for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone unless the city or county finds that the construction meets the criteria referenced above. Existing law authorizes the Department of Water Resources to administer funding, from various sources, for flood risk reduction projects. This bill would authorize the Department of Water Resources to provide reimbursement to funding recipients that execute a funding agreement under the Urban Flood Risk Reduction Projects program for expenditures associated with continued funding of a project initiated under the Early Implementation Project program and incurred after July 1, 2014, and before the execution of the funding agreement, but no later than July 1, 2015. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
died
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2013
Committee Review
Aug 2014
Assembly Passage
May 2013
Senate Passage
Aug 2014
Governor
Introduced Jan 14, 2013
Last action Nov 30, 2014
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2014 · Assembly May 29, 2013
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 30, 2014
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Aug 30, 2014
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Aug 30, 2014
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 30, 2014
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 25, 2014
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Aug 30, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 12, 2013
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 25, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 13, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
May 29, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-1-3)
assembly
May 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).
lower
Apr 17, 2013
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 10, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 18, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
lower
Jan 15, 2013
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 14.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Susan Eggman
DDemocratic
Co
DL
Dan Logue
RRepublican
Co
Jim Nielsen
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 125
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 125. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline