Health care coverage: bridge plan.
Summary
Existing law, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, requires each state to, by January 1, 2014, establish an American Health Benefit Exchange that makes available qualified health plans to qualified individuals and small employers. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Under existing law, carriers that sell any products outside the California Health Benefit Exchange (Exchange) are required to fairly and affirmatively offer, market, and sell all products made available to individuals or small employers in the Exchange to individuals or small employers, respectively, purchasing coverage outside the Exchange. Existing law also requires carriers that participate in the Exchange to fairly and affirmatively offer, market, and sell in the Exchange at least one product within 5 levels of specified coverage. This bill would exempt a bridge plan product, as defined, from that latter requirement. This bill would, among other things, also require the Exchange to enter into contracts with and certify as a qualified health plan bridge plan products that meet specified requirements, including being a Medi-Cal managed care plan. The bill would also require the Exchange to make available bridge plan products to eligible individuals. The bill would authorize the Exchange, after consulting with stakeholders, to adopt regulations to implement those provisions, and until January 1, 2016, exempt the adoption, amendment, or repeal of those regulations from the Administrative Procedure Act. The bill would require the Exchange to annually prepare a specified written report on the implementation and performance of the Exchange functions during the preceding fiscal year, and to prepare, or contract for the preparation of, an evaluation of the bridge plan program using the first 3 years of experience with the program, as specified. The bill would authorize a health care service plan or insurance carrier offering a bridge plan product in the Exchange to limit the products it offers in the Exchange to the bridge plan product, except as required by federal law. The bill would define "bridge plan product" as an individual health benefit plan offered by a licensed health care service plan or health insurer that contracts with the Exchange, as specified. The bill would also require the State Department of Health Care Services to impose specified requirements in its contracts with a health care service plan or health insurer to provide Medi-Cal managed care coverage but would authorize the department to contract with the Exchange to delegate the implementation of those provisions. The bill would require the Exchange to seek federal approval to allow specified individuals the option to enroll in a different bridge plan product if the individual's primary care provider is included in the contracted network of the different bridge plan product and either the bridge plan product for which the individual is eligible is not offered in that individual's service area or is not offered as a bridge plan product by the Exchange. The bill would provide that its provisions would become inoperative on the October 1 that is 5 years after the date that federal approval of the bridge plan option occurs.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2013
Committee Review
Jul 2013
Senate Passage
Apr 2013
Assembly Passage
Jun 2013
Signed into Law
Jul 2013
Introduced Feb 5, 2013
Signed Jul 11, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Apr 11, 2013 · Assembly Jun 27, 2013
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 34
Apr 11, 2013
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
12
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Jul 11, 2013
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 1, 2013
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 86.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 27, 2013
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-1-1)
assembly
Jun 27, 2013
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 24, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (June 24).
lower
Jun 19, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 15, 2013
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 14, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (June 11).
lower
May 28, 2013
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
May 9, 2013
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Apr 11, 2013
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-1)
senate
Apr 8, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 42.) (April 8).
upper
Mar 20, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 36.) (March 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 14, 2013
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Mar 6, 2013
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ed Hernandez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 3
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 3. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline